> I think it will be very hard to get Perl's "spirit" into enforcable
legalese
> - but it may be worth trying.
Absolutely, a hard copy would be nicer than the present mash of emotional
core dumps.
At 20:04 -0500 01.16.2001, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
>Related to this, though, I have a procedural question:
>
> Does anyone know if Larry is considering "leave it as it is" for all
> options on RFCs? Chris noted that there wasn't a point in writing an RFC
> that said: "perl's license stays th
At 11:03 AM 1/17/01 -0200, Branden wrote:
>Hi.
>
>I'm actually not following this list from close and I searching the archives
>isn't that easy yet, so pardon me if this was already brought up.
As Simon's pointed out, there's an RFC for this already.
It's actually not that tough to do now with e
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Branden wrote:
> I'm actually not following this list from close and I searching the archives
> isn't that easy yet, so pardon me if this was already brought up.
>
> I work with Perl and I also work with Tcl, and one thing I actually like
> about Tcl is that it's interactive
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:03:05AM -0200, Branden wrote:
> I work with Perl and I also work with Tcl, and one thing I actually like
> about Tcl is that it's interactive like a shell, i.e. it gives you a prompt,
> where you type commands in and, if you type a whole command by the end of
> the line,
Hi.
I'm actually not following this list from close and I searching the archives
isn't that easy yet, so pardon me if this was already brought up.
I work with Perl and I also work with Tcl, and one thing I actually like
about Tcl is that it's interactive like a shell, i.e. it gives you a prompt,
