On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 08:27:21PM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> Could you explain why do you think going more GPL would be a good thing
> for Perl?
I do not think that Bradley is suggesting that Perl would "go more GPL",
because that would be indefensibly insane. Bradley is proposing that
Could you explain why do you think going more GPL would be a good thing
for Perl? What things it would change compared with the current scheme?
What problems it would solve? Do you not think it would create new ones?
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> People who are going to steal the source will do so regardless of the
> license on the source, and the people who are going to respect the license
> will do so regardless of which it is.
The license has to be sound, clear, and defendable legally---that m
At 15:32 -0500 2001.01.05, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>Honestly, the license we choose will only restrict those people who will
>respect it, either for moral or legal reasons. That's one reason to choose
>a license that places the fewest restrictions on those people, and the GPL
>is not that license.
Tr
