Re: Perl 6 compiling Perl 6?

2000-12-22 Thread Deven T. Corzine
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 03:56:06PM -0500, Deven T. Corzine wrote: > > Except for obvious performance-critical bottleneck areas, what advantages > > are there to implementing anything else first in C? > > One reason (maybe not a good one) I can think

Re: Perl 6 compiling Perl 6?

2000-12-22 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 03:56:06PM -0500, Deven T. Corzine wrote: > Except for obvious performance-critical bottleneck areas, what advantages > are there to implementing anything else first in C? One reason (maybe not a good one) I can think of There are people who already have experience of wri

Re: Perl 6 compiling Perl 6?

2000-12-22 Thread Deven T. Corzine
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 02:43 PM 12/22/00 -0500, Deven T. Corzine wrote: > >I don't know if this has been discussed before, but I'm just tossing this > >idea on the table for discussion and consideration. (If this was already > >discussed, please tell me what the conclusio

Re: Perl 6 compiling Perl 6?

2000-12-22 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 02:43 PM 12/22/00 -0500, Deven T. Corzine wrote: >I don't know if this has been discussed before, but I'm just tossing this >idea on the table for discussion and consideration. (If this was already >discussed, please tell me what the conclusion was, if any.) > >How about implementing the Perl

Autovivification behavior

2000-12-22 Thread Deven T. Corzine
Can the autovivication behavior be changed slightly for Perl 6? Specificly, can we suppress autovivication in read-only circumstances, and evaluate the expression as "undef" immediately instead of autovivicating empty data structures that didn't exist before? The current behavior in Perl 5 is i

Perl 6 compiling Perl 6?

2000-12-22 Thread Deven T. Corzine
I don't know if this has been discussed before, but I'm just tossing this idea on the table for discussion and consideration. (If this was already discussed, please tell me what the conclusion was, if any.) How about implementing the Perl 6 compiler in Perl 6 itself? Note that I'm _not_ talking

Re: Garbage collector slowness

2000-12-22 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:40:46AM -0500, Mark-Jason Dominus wrote: > The part I found interesting was the part about elimination of the message. > Perceived slowness is also important. Perl 6 is going to be much faster. (Than what I don't know, but I'm just helping to propagate the perception.)