- Original Message -
From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Nathan Torkington"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 10:59 PM
Subject: Guidelines for internals proposals and documentation
> Here are s
hi,
this is a little off-topic, so PLEASE answer privately; I'll sum up
in a day or three.
I'm getting a new box to replace the current hardware running
tmtowtdi.perl.org (perl and cpan.org mail, ftp.perl.org,
www.cpan.org and other stuff), so I need a Perlish name for it.
Reusing the same name
Here are some guidelines for the design process for internals-level docs.
1) The damn things will be called PDD, or Perl Design Documents. Calling
them RFCs was getting confusing for those of us dealing with IETF RFCs,
especially as we're edging in towards the active RFC range.
2) We start cou
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 12:58:25PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> (Though I don't think we really need more than a few weeks to get a good
> set of working RFCs for this, though of course they'll get amended and
> expanded as work proceeds)
I'd like to see a revised set of RFC guidelines specific
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, David Grove wrote:
> I'm very surprised to see planning groups for api and parsing for perl6
> springing up, with goals of providing RFC's in nine days.
The "deadlines" has never been a implicit mark where work would have
to stop, but just a date for when the chair (or whoe
At 12:10 PM 11/14/00 +, David Grove wrote:
I think these questions have been answered already, but just in case they
haven't it doesn't hurt to re-iterate.
>Sorry for the crosspost (the information was requested). This is where I
>got the information on the new api groups. I've subscribed t
Sorry for the crosspost (the information was requested). This is where I
got the information on the new api groups. I've subscribed to the groups
but haven't seen any traffic on them yet. I don't see any reason to
believe that this wouldn't be authentic, but if it is, then if I'm not
missing some
Ok, so I'm not off in la-la land. See you in parser. I have a couple
things you might like...
Thanks, Dan
pete
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:17 AM 11/14/00 +, David Grove wrote:
> >Dan & al.,
> >
> >I'm very surprised to see planning groups for api and parsing for
per
At 12:17 AM 11/14/00 +, David Grove wrote:
>Dan & al.,
>
>I'm very surprised to see planning groups for api and parsing for perl6
>springing up, with goals of providing RFC's in nine days. This is rather
>confusing given that Larry hasn't yet (that I'm aware of) determined what
>Perl6 will eve
Did I miss something? I didn't see any discussion. Was this off-line?
Where is this list of api groups?
> "DG" == David Grove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DG> Dan & al.,
DG> I'm very surprised to see planning groups for api and parsing for perl6
DG> springing up, with goals of providing RF
10 matches
Mail list logo
