Joshua N Pritikin writes:
: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/python/2000/10/04/stackless-intro.html
Perl 5 is already stackless in that sense, though we never implemented
continuations. The main impetus for going stackless was to make it
possible to implement a Forth-style treaded code interprete
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 11:07:44AM -0400, Ken Fox wrote:
> Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> > http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/python/2000/10/04/stackless-intro.html
>
> That talks about moving from the C stack to a frame stack, continuations,
> co-routines and microthreads. None of it made much sense.
Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/python/2000/10/04/stackless-intro.html
That talks about moving from the C stack to a frame stack, continuations,
co-routines and microthreads. None of it made much sense. (Choosing
continuations as the basis of the system would be very Sc
"David L. Nicol" wrote:
> So what would be involved in adding hooks for arbitrary semantic analysis?
At the most fundamental level all you need is a parse tree with attributes
that you can write constraints against. IMHO there isn't much difference
in technique between "semantic analysis" and "op
