autogen

2000-10-09 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
http://autogen.sourceforge.net/ Maybe everyone knows about this already but I didn't know about it until just now. Enjoy. -- May the best description of competition prevail. (via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank)

Re: Continued RFC process

2000-10-09 Thread Stephen Zander
> "David" == David Grove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David> If the "public say" is limited to an RFC freeforall, then David> closed off to let the elite go to work, then the whole David> "public say" policy is a farce an order of magnitude worse David> than the "great perl merg

Re: Perl recommended reading list

2000-10-09 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 12:56 PM 10/9/00 -0400, John Porter wrote: >Dan Sugalski wrote: > > > >The Mythical Man-Month > >Fred Brooks > >That reminds me: I highly recommended "Anti-Patterns": > www.antipatterns.com/briefing Nifty. I think it's another book to add to the pile. (I might finish the pile

Re: RFC 334 (v1) Perl should allow specially attributed subs to be called as C functions

2000-10-09 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 08:50 PM 9/29/00 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: >On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 12:37:15PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > At 04:13 PM 9/29/00 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > >Are you suggesting that the attributes use the same mapping system as > > >the XS (or son-of-XS (XS++)) typemaps in lib/ExtUtils

Re: Continued RFC process

2000-10-09 Thread Simon Cozens
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 01:10:57PM -0500, David Grove wrote: > >Perl 6 Public Relations - brian d foy > > Public relations? Uh, who is the Perl 6 information officer? I don't have the faintest idea. -- "You can have my Unix system when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers."