- "Leif Andersson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But what is the best way to deal with all those broken UTF8 encodings
> we encounter over and over again when importing MARC records from
> outer space?
>
> As it is now the application dies with something like
> 'utf8 "\xXX" does not map to Unic
I have been made aware of a bug in MARC::Lint, dealing with 880 field and
with linked subfields (subfield 6). 880 indicator valid values are currently
improperly parsed, so 'Same' are the only allowed values (as in 'Same as
associated field'). For subfield 6, it should always be the 1st subfield
ac
