On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 11:29 AM, Leif Andersson wrote:
You mean 5.005?
Maybe that's what is required.
Oops, yes, thanks for the correction.
Paul.
--
Paul Hoffman :: Taubman Medical Library :: Univ. of Michigan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://www.nkuitse.com/
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 05:29:09PM +0100, Leif Andersson wrote:
> What I am trying to do is to identify areas in the API where improvments can
> be done.
Much appreciated. The return values should be consistent 0/undef, athough
logically they amount to the same thing in Perl. Could you add a tic
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 08:07:18AM +0100, Leif Andersson wrote:
> And it shouldn't even break any existing code.
Shouldn't :) But it will be an additional dependency, that is mostly
superfluous. Interesting bit of code though! Thanks for sharing.
//Ed
ary
SE-106 91 Stockholm
SWEDEN
Phone : +46 8 162769
Mobile: +46 70 6904281
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Paul Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 7 november 2003 14:46
Till: Leif Andersson
Kopia: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ämne: Re: Return values from MARC::Record
On Friday,
On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 02:07 AM, Leif Andersson wrote:
At the top of MARC::Record we add:
use Want;
This would introduce a dependency on Perl 5.6, which Want requires.
MARC::Record currently only requires 5.5, as far as I can tell.
Paul.
--
Paul Hoffman :: Taubman Medical Library ::
o understand.
Paul.
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Paul Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 6 november 2003 22:30
Till: Leif Andersson
Kopia: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ämne: Re: Return values from MARC::Record
On Thursday, November 6, 2003, at 01:14 PM, Leif Andersson wrote:
With the
ow this can be. Am I missing something?
Paul.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Paul Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 6 november 2003 22:30
Till: Leif Andersson
Kopia: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ämne: Re: Return values from MARC::Record
On Thursday, November 6, 2003, at 01:14 PM,
some extra work to the subfield() method we can also do this
$subfield = $record->subfield('035','a');
@subfields = $record->subfield('035','a');
print "subfield=$subfield\n";
print "[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
__END__
And it shouldn'
subfields = eval { $record->field('035')->subfield('a') };
Leif
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Paul Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 6 november 2003 22:30
Till: Leif Andersson
Kopia: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ämne: Re: Return values from MARC::Record
On
On Thursday, November 6, 2003, at 01:14 PM, Leif Andersson wrote:
With the same BAD record we try $subfield = eval {
$record->field($tag)->subfield($sub) }
This is the only case where we have to put the code in eval.
Should MARC:: take care of the eval for us? I am beginning to think so.
No, it
10 matches
Mail list logo
