MARC::Record manifest was RE: MARC::Lint update

2005-01-30 Thread Bryan Baldus
At 1:05 PM -0600 1/23/05, Ed Summers wrote: I added the new files to the [MARC::Lint] MANIFEST so make test would succeed. I had forgotten to do this when I added files to MARC::Record for the DOS EOF tests. The MARC::Record MANIFEST has now been updated. -- Bryan Baldus [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Re: MARC::Lint update

2005-01-24 Thread Ed Summers
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 08:37:41AM -0600, Bryan Baldus wrote: > I generally 'use warnings' or use the -w flag in the modules and scripts > I've been writing. I didn't notice it was missing. I need to add strict and > warnings to CodeData, as well. In modules/package files, is it practice to > leave

RE: MARC::Lint update

2005-01-24 Thread Bryan Baldus
>There were some unitialized variable warnings, nothing serious. 'make >test' will run perl under the warnings pragma, so 'use warnings' in your >module will help you catch this sort of thing early. I generally 'use warnings' or use the -w flag in the modules and scripts I've been writing. I didn'

Re: MARC::Lint update

2005-01-23 Thread Ed Summers
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 08:48:50AM -0600, Bryan Baldus wrote: > The SourceForge CVS version of MARC::Lint has been updated with new > checks (041, 043), revisions to check_245, a new internal > _check_article method, the addition of MARC::Lint::CodeData (for 041, > 043, etc.), and 2 new tests. W