RE: Future of MARC::Lint

2004-12-17 Thread Bryan Baldus
>Ok, in that case I'll upload 1.39 myself and make you a maintainer. This >way the MARC::Record distribution can reference MARC::Lint if necessary, >and you'll have a baseline version to move forward from. That sounds good. I thought I had version 1.40, with updated DATA (to update #4, Oct. 2003)

Re: Future of MARC::Lint

2004-12-16 Thread Ed Summers
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 05:10:45PM -0600, Bryan Baldus wrote: > I hope to have time to work on this this weekend. The only changes I plan to > make to the current version are the DATA fixes described before (adding > 001-008 and correcting the valid/obsolete indicator values). I've downloaded > the

RE: Future of MARC::Lint

2004-12-16 Thread Bryan Baldus
On Thursday, December 16, 2004 4:05 PM, Ed Summers wrote: >It might be a good idea to release the current MARC::Lint as a separate >package to CPAN before releasing new versions. That way we have a baseline >to work from. >Bryan if you need help doing this for the first time (from SourceForge) let

Re: Future of MARC::Lint

2004-12-16 Thread Ed Summers
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 04:00:34PM -0600, Andy Lester wrote: > If it's actually been removed from the MANIFEST and doesn't ship, then > that's a Bad Thing. I want to wait until there IS a replacement distro > available that I can point at. It might be a good idea to release the current MARC::Lint

Re: Future of MARC::Lint

2004-12-16 Thread Andy Lester
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 08:17:11AM -0600, Bryan Baldus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > MARC::Lint has now been moved out of the MARC::Record distibution, in > anticipation of its release as a standalone package distribution. The > MARC::Doc::Tutorial needs to be updated to reflect the change. If it'