Based on datestamps of various scripts, looks like I received and tested
it in May 2005 and started using it in production scripts in August
2005.
Anne L. Highsmith
Consortia Systems Coordinator
5000 TAMU
Evans Library
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX 77843-5000
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
979-862
On 1/18/07, Edward Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 18, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Mike Rylander wrote:
> Ed, I assume that stuff is in CVS?
Yes all I gave to Anne is what was in HEAD.
Rock. Just as I suspected. In that case we may be able to just
consider that a pre-release of 2.0.0 ...
An
On Jan 18, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Mike Rylander wrote:
Ed, I assume that stuff is in CVS?
Yes all I gave to Anne is what was in HEAD.
//Ed
>I think, because of the number and size of the changes involved, it
>would be good to stamp the next version of MARC::Record as 2.0.0.
I very much support its release as v. 2.0.0 (or anything starting with 2).
This distinguishes the new versions requiring modern Perl (post-5.8.0) from
the earlier
- Mike Rylander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think, because of the number and size of the changes involved, it
> would be good to stamp the next version of MARC::Record as 2.0.0.
> There's a good bit of stuff that hasn't been very widely tested,
> though I know Evergreen and Koha use it on a
On Jan 18, 2007, at 2:48 PM, Mike Rylander wrote:
So it is written, so it shall be done.
Thanks brian for making this happen...and mikery for allowing M::R to
pass into your very capable hands. It's pretty awesome to see M::R is
at the heart of systems like Evergreen and Koha--especially si
