Re: Lint.pm and 250$b

2003-12-03 Thread Ed Summers
Bryan: On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:31:59PM -0600, Bryan Baldus wrote: > When I ran Lint on a file of records, one of the errors I received was "250: > Subfield _b is not allowed." The LC doc [1] is meticulously formatted (which is what allows specs to do what it does). Unfortunately the 250 has a

Re: Lint.pm and 250$b

2003-12-03 Thread Ed Summers
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:31:59PM -0600, Bryan Baldus wrote: > When I ran Lint on a file of records, one of the errors I received was "250: > Subfield _b is not allowed." Sorry for the delay. This indeed looks like a bug in MARC::Lint. In case you are curious MARC::Lint's rules are obtained in an

Lint.pm and 250$b

2003-11-18 Thread Bryan Baldus
When I ran Lint on a file of records, one of the errors I received was "250: Subfield _b is not allowed." According to the most recent documentation, 250$b is $b - Remainder of edition statement (NR). I do not know when this change took place, but it has been around for as long as I can remember (t