On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Galen Charlton wrote:
> If there are no major objections, in a week's time I plan to make the
> CVS repo read-only and we'll move forward with Git.
Hooray, thanks so much Galen! Sounds like a great plan moving forward.
//Ed
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Ed Summers wrote:
> I would argue for keeping stuff on sf.net ... and leapfrogging svn for
> git if we can.
To that end, I've enabled Git in the marcpm SourceForge project and
established a new repository which contains the history from the five
CVS modules
