2009/7/22 Galen Charlton :
> Hi,
>
> Nope, just haven't gotten around to pushing it. Soon, I promise!
>
> Funny you should mention CVS. I have a general question for the
> MARC/Perl hackers: Ed mentioned a while back moving from CVS to a more
> modern VCS such as Subversion or (my preference) Git
Speaking for myself only, of course: Please, for the love of god, move away
from CVS. Moving the code to a more modern VCS and a well-supported host. The
least-painful move might be to SVN on Google Code.
I'm pretty sure there's nothing but CVS available for OS9, though, so the
question has to
On Wednesday, July 22, 2009 4:10 PM, Galen Charlton
[galen.charl...@liblime.com] wrote:
>Funny you should mention CVS. I have a general question for the
MARC/Perl hackers: Ed mentioned a while back moving from CVS to a more
modern VCS such as Subversion or (my preference) Git. I'm willing to
do
Hi,
Nope, just haven't gotten around to pushing it. Soon, I promise!
Funny you should mention CVS. I have a general question for the
MARC/Perl hackers: Ed mentioned a while back moving from CVS to a more
modern VCS such as Subversion or (my preference) Git. I'm willing to
do the legwork to get
Was it decided that Bill's escaping output patch would be dropped? I
don't see it in CVS yet.
It would be nice to see the 0.91 release get pushed out the door, in
any case. 0.88 was a long time ago.
Dan
2009/4/14 Galen Charlton :
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
>> 20
