I apologize, but I'm finding it hard to trace what exactly this script
is doing. I did take a look at the first failure and sure enough the
record leader says it's 463 bytes but the record itself is 464 bytes.
So a failure is warranted -- given the current behavior of
MARC::Record.
Perhaps dumbin
Joshua M. Ferraro a écrit :
- "Mike Rylander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CVS is updated with that now, and after anyone willing makes sure
it's not breaking anything I think we should release again.
Just updated and ran make test successfully. I'm happy to
roll a release today if there are
With MARC::Charset 0.96, MARC::Record 2.0.0, and MARC::File::XML from
CVS, I get failed tests for 7 out of 8 of Joshua's tests. Test STDIN
and STDOUT output attached.
Dan Scott
On 16/04/07, Joshua M. Ferraro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- "Mike Rylander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CVS is up
- "Mike Rylander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CVS is updated with that now, and after anyone willing makes sure
> it's not breaking anything I think we should release again.
Just updated and ran make test successfully. I'm happy to
roll a release today if there are no objections.
This may be
