Re: New version of Tk::MARC_Editor

2006-01-06 Thread David Christensen
Ok - thanks for checking that out, Bryan. There's a fixed version now at: http://maplin.gov.mb.ca/pub/util/Tk-MARC_Editor-0.9.tar.gz The sample-application file dialog stuff is fixed to now use the native file-open/file-save dialogs for whatever platform you're on. The bindings for the shift key

RE: New version of Tk::MARC_Editor

2006-01-06 Thread Bryan Baldus
I don't really have any suggestions for the name, but I have run the two sample pls briefly. I like the new tkme2.pl. However, I did experience the following (using WinXP): -After loading a record, occasionally something goes wrong and the editable leader bytes become uneditable. Also, sometimes t

Re: MARC::File::XML

2006-01-06 Thread Paul POULAIN
Ed Summers a écrit : I'm curious what people would find to be the best default behavior for MARC::File::XML when it creates a MARC::Record object from XML. Should the character encoding by default by transposed from UTF-8 to MARC-8? Or should it be left as UTF-8? maybe a new_from_xml($xml,$encodi

MARC::File::XML

2006-01-06 Thread Ed Summers
I'm curious what people would find to be the best default behavior for MARC::File::XML when it creates a MARC::Record object from XML. Should the character encoding by default by transposed from UTF-8 to MARC-8? Or should it be left as UTF-8? //Ed

Re: New version of Tk::MARC_Editor

2006-01-06 Thread David Christensen
Thanks for the comment, Brad. Yeah, I was wondering about that. My reasoning is that Tk has a number of widgets, like Tk::Text for dealing with free-form text, or the Tk::DBI::Table for playing with SQL... so an argument could be made that Tk::MARC_Editor is a beast like that - a Tk widget specif

Re: New version of Tk::MARC_Editor

2006-01-06 Thread Brad Baxter
On 1/5/06, David Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... Any thoughts on CPAN namespace stuff? I > don't suspect that anyone is using Tk::MARC... should I rename > Tk::MARC_Editor to that (you can't just use one as a drop-in replacement > for > the other, though... so maybe not). > > As al