(I'm sending this again, because I think my formatted record may have
gotten messed up in the process of being cut/pasted. My aplogies.)
I don't see how you can get a result for your search if you're using @attr
1=7. 7 is the USE attribute for an ISBN search, and your term is the local
system
I don't see how you can get a result for your search if you're using @attr
1=7. 7 is the USE attribute for an ISBN search, and your term is the local
system number, I think (use attribute=12)
When I do that search (@attr 1=12 3118006) against the LC bib file, using
Net::Z3950 in a program es
The uploaded file
MARC-Record-1.34.tar.gz
has entered CPAN as
file: $CPAN/authors/id/P/PE/PETDANCE/MARC-Record-1.34.tar.gz
The big change in this release is the ability to read from a pipe, or
an output stream. In our case (at Follett Library Resources), we have
thousands of MARC files t
First, we probably want to figure out what character set the records are
encoded in as received from LOC. Since only the non-ASCII characters will
give us a clue, we can look at the umlauted-u ("ü") in Dürer.
Charset hex character(s) used to represent "ü"
---
MARC-8 0xE8 0x7
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:52:56PM +0100, Tajoli Zeno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2) In MARC-8 character set a letter like "è" [e grave] is done with TWO
> bytes one for the sign [the grave accent] and one for the letter [the
> letter e].
>
> 3)In the leader, position 0-4 you have the numbe
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:52:56PM +0100, Tajoli Zeno wrote:
> 1)When you call LOC without a specific character you recive data in MARC-8
> character set.
>
> 2) In MARC-8 character set a letter like "è" [e grave] is done with TWO
> bytes one for the sign [the grave accent] and one for the lett
Hi,
in fact the question is quite complex to explain, and I'm not sure that I
can explain well.
At 14.57 16/12/03, you wrote:
This process works just fine for records that contain no diacritics, but
when diacritics are in the records extra characters end up in my saved
files, like this:
00901
On 12/15/03 8:54 AM, Eric Lease Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In order to get the MARC records for my "catalog" I have been searching the
> LOC catalog, identifying the record I desire, and using Net::Z3950 to download
> the desired record via the MARC 001 tag. Tastes great. Less filling.
>
