Re: MARC::Record leader

2003-09-19 Thread Ed Summers
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 07:58:01PM +0530, Saiful Amin wrote: > I never had to worry about the record_length (pos 00-04) or the > base_address (pos 12-16) in the leader. I think they are automagically > updated while writing the record via $rec->as_usmarc(). saiful++ Yes, they should be automatic

Re: MARC::Record leader

2003-09-19 Thread Saiful Amin
Hi Paul, > (notes i speak here of UNIMARC. loc is down at the moment, but i think > leaders are the same in marc21 and in unimarc) Since LoC is still down you can refer to http://search.cpan.org/src/PETDANCE/MARC-Record-1.29/etc/ecbdlist.html > So my question : > Am I wrong or could we add $rec

Re: MARC::Record leader

2003-09-19 Thread paul POULAIN
OK, i've a BIG problem with record leader. Joshua makes me discover that MARC::Record didn't set anything in the record leader ! I think he could (or there's smth I don't understand) pos 0-4 are "record length" => they could be calculated no ? pos10 is always 2 pos 12-16 should be calculated too