> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Rob May wrote:
>> 2009/4/22 Jeremy White :
>>> I vote for adding the XP style request directly to perl.exe - in
>>> almost all cases it's the "correct" thing to do and is easy enough
>>> to remove (and indeed from PerlApp) should you need to. It's also
>>> backward compatib
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Rob May wrote:
> 2009/4/22 Jeremy White :
> > I vote for adding the XP style request directly to perl.exe - in
> > almost all cases it's the "correct" thing to do and is easy enough
> > to remove (and indeed from PerlApp) should you need to. It's also
> > backward compatible so
2009/4/22 Jeremy White :
> I vote for adding the XP style request directly to perl.exe - in almost all
> cases it's the "correct" thing to do and is easy enough to remove (and
> indeed from PerlApp) should you need to. It's also backward compatible so it
> wont harm Win 2000 users etc.
I think I v
I vote for adding the XP style request directly to perl.exe - in almost all
cases it's the "correct" thing to do and is easy enough to remove (and indeed
from PerlApp) should you need to. It's also backward compatible so it wont harm
Win 2000 users etc.
Cheers,
Jeremy.
From: j...@activestate.co
4 matches
Mail list logo
