On Oct 5, 2011, at 14:46 , Jared Johnson wrote:
> eh... didn't mean to send this with no subject :)
>
>> Our software generates a whole lot of concurrent LDAP traffic right now
>> and we started running into an issue where our child processes would hang
>> forever waiting around for LDAP operati
> $sock->timeout is intended to be a connect timeout. Why should read
> timeout be the same.
well, it seemed like a good compromise short of providing a new API, which
I didn't have any bright ideas about. If you thought it best to provide
such an API, I wouldn't object to using it :) Also, I gu
On Oct 6, 2011, at 09:43 , Jared Johnson wrote:
>> $sock->timeout is intended to be a connect timeout. Why should read
>> timeout be the same.
>
> well, it seemed like a good compromise short of providing a new API, which
> I didn't have any bright ideas about. If you thought it best to provide
