[perf-discuss] Changing Solaris kernel page size

Hi, I'm running Solaris 10 update 2 on Ultra 10 that has 440MHz USIIi CPU. When I run 'trapstat -T' I notice that Solaris kernel is mainly using 8k pages and about 9% of the time is spent on handling TLB misses in the kernel. I've set the following variables in /etc/profile to force userland app

Re: [perf-discuss] can't get filebench to work

ther using runbench or running filebench from within the directory where it is located or using its fullpath name. -- Regards, Raymond ___ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [perf-discuss] can't get filebench to work

't have such an issue. Regards, Raymond On 08/02/07, Jim Barker wrote: > Thank you for the tip...I ran filebench using the full path and below are the > results, > I still think there is some issue. The trouble started with this line. > > 895: 80.706: flowop openfile2 failed t

Re: [perf-discuss] Results of workload loop...

sible the total size of the fileset exceeds 1T. Maybe you can check files under src dir and dest dir, and decrease $nfiles or $filesize if that happens. You can find more detailed information on Attributes here: http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/FileBench_Workload_Language#Attribute

[perf-discuss] Poor Solaris 10 performance

Hi, I am experiencing poor performance on our Solaris 10 installation. The bash script that I wrote took more than 20 minutes to complete on the Solaris instance, while the exact same script only take 45 seconds on an intel-linux installation. Though the Intel CPU is running at 2.8GH & the Spa

Re: [perf-discuss] Poor Solaris 10 performance

Hi, Thanks for taking a look. The SPARC system is a Sun V440 with 4 CPUs and 16GB of RAM. The normal CPU load is about 50% and minimal disk activity. What the script does is to go through a text file and get the beginning & ending line # for printing the pages specified. The part of the script

Re: [perf-discuss] Poor Solaris 10 performance

Hi Guys, Thanks for the tips. I understand now that a simple comparison as I did wasn't accurate. And I managed to reduce the script's runtime from around 20 minutes to about 4 seconds just by following your 2 tips. Awesome! Thanks again & keep up the good work. -- This message posted from op

Re: [perf-discuss] Project proposal: "Solaris Enhancements for AMD-based Platforms"

+1 for me as well This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@opensolaris.org