Re: [perf-discuss] swap discrepancy

2008-06-16 Thread David Lutz
If your memory reservations exceed your backing store, the additional reservations are being made against physical RAM. That means you have physical memory that is not available for active use, either for memory allocations or for things like file system buffering. I hesitate to say that it makes

Re: [perf-discuss] swap discrepancy

2008-06-16 Thread Awais Vaseer
Hi David, Thanks for the detailed reply. You said: "If your memory reservations exceed the size of your backing store, you can have memory allocation failures while still having lots of unallocated backing store." In our case the swap device is 40GB in size. Does it mean we're likely to see me

Re: [perf-discuss] swap discrepancy

2008-06-16 Thread David Lutz
The space reported by "swap -l" refers to disk-based backing store, but the swap values reported by "swap -s", "sar -r", vmstat, and top all refer to available space in swapfs, which is the vnode interface between the anon layer and physical swap devices. It is essentially virtual swap space, and