Hi Krishna,
Krishna Yenduri wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a user level benchmark that does
> for (i = 0; i < nthreads; i++)
> (void) thr_create(NULL, 0, testaes, (void *)0,
> THR_NEW_LWP, &tid);
>
> I found that running this benchmark with nthreads == ncpus
> sc
Krishna Yenduri wrote:
> Bart Smaalders wrote:
>> ...
>> Keep in mind the differences between lwps and kernel threads, esp. on
>> NUMA (MPO) platforms. Note that lgrp_choose isn't called for kernel
>> threads
>>
>
> That explains it then. Thanks.
>
>> What are you trying to do?
>>
>
Bart Smaalders wrote:
> ...
> Keep in mind the differences between lwps and kernel threads, esp. on
> NUMA (MPO) platforms. Note that lgrp_choose isn't called for kernel
> threads
>
That explains it then. Thanks.
> What are you trying to do?
>
The kernel test models the behavior of
Krishna Yenduri wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a user level benchmark that does
> for (i = 0; i < nthreads; i++)
> (void) thr_create(NULL, 0, testaes, (void *)0,
> THR_NEW_LWP, &tid);
>
> I found that running this benchmark with nthreads == ncpus
> schedules eac
