Re: [perf-discuss] Re: libMicro page added

2005-08-24 Thread Bart Smaalders
Martin wrote: I get an error when trying to compile libmicro using cc: When I type make I get: ... cc -c -O -DUSE_GETHRTIME -D_REENTRANT ../atomic.c -o atomic.o "../atomic.c", line 42: cannot find include file: "../atomic.c", line 64: warning: implicit function declaration: atomic_add_32_nv cc

Re: [perf-discuss] Re: libMicro page added

2005-08-12 Thread Phil Harman
Ben Cooper wrote: Interestingly when I ran the cascade_flock 200 test manually I got the resource temporarily unavailable fork error straight away, so I don't think it's libMicro not waiting for the processes of previous tests to run. When I tried putting the kern.maxproc and macprocperuid

Re: [perf-discuss] Re: libMicro page added

2005-08-10 Thread Ben Cooper
On 10/08/2005, at 9:48 AM, Eric C. Saxe wrote: So around 8300 for both. The "c_" tests deal with some number of processes/threads that are handing locks around in a ring. The "_10" tests should be creating 10 processes, the "_200" test should be creating 200, etc...so it's interesting that you'r

Re: [perf-discuss] Re: libMicro page added

2005-08-10 Thread Phil Harman
Dave Marquardt wrote: Gabriel Díaz wrote: > How is possible to make a microbenchmark library portable? > well, i mean, can i compile the lib on other OS and do the > test agaist it, and compare results? It's not a library, it's a collection of microbenchmarks. But I can see why you might think

Re: [perf-discuss] Re: libMicro page added

2005-08-09 Thread Derek Cicero
Eric C. Saxe wrote: Hey look at that. My previous message has been robbed of line breaks and the first part of this thread has gone missing. Looks like the html I embedded really confused things. Here's a more readable version of my last message. I'll let Derek know that this thread needs to b

Re: [perf-discuss] Re: libMicro page added

2005-08-08 Thread Michael Pogue
Bob, You're right. It seems to work OK with 'cc', but these 3 benchmarks also fail with gcc 3.4.3 (which is the version that is part of Solaris10 right now). I'm on Nevada build 14. Mike Bob Palowoda wrote: I don't know if it related to my envionment but when I compile the tests with gc

Re: [perf-discuss] Re: libMicro page added

2005-08-08 Thread Alexander . Gorshenev
On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, Bob Palowoda wrote: I don't know if it related to my envionment but when I compile the tests with gcc 3.3.4 or 4.0.1 the longjmp, siglongjmp and connection tests get stuck in an infinite loop consuming the cpu. Not sure on the connection test yet maybe I didn't let it run l

Re: [perf-discuss] Re: libMicro page added

2005-08-08 Thread Dave Marquardt
"Gabriel" == Gabriel Díaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Gabriel> How is possible to make a microbenchmark library portable? Gabriel> well, i mean, can i compile the lib on other OS and do the Gabriel> test agaist it, and compare results? It's not a library, it's a collection of microbenchmarks. Bu