Eric Saxe wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Eric Saxe wrote:
> >> Roland Mainz wrote:
> >>> Is there any special handling of process groups to make sure that
> >>> processes (and their LWPs) are kept together ?
> >>>
> >>> Think about an (imaginary (and simplified)) machine with 4 strands per
> >>>
Roland Mainz wrote:
Eric Saxe wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Is there any special handling of process groups to make sure that
processes (and their LWPs) are kept together ?
Think about an (imaginary (and simplified)) machine with 4 strands per
core, 4 cores per socket, 4 sockets per board
> Yes, known problem... my question is more about the problem what happens
> when there are many free CPUs/boards with "equal" priority. Is there
> anything which looks at other attributes than the hardware to shepherd
> the threads/processes to stay together or migrate in groups ?
Application's
Eric Saxe wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Is there any special handling of process groups to make sure that
> > processes (and their LWPs) are kept together ?
> >
> > Think about an (imaginary (and simplified)) machine with 4 strands per
> > core, 4 cores per socket, 4 sockets per board and 4 boar
