I'm curious why you decided to keep r12_oApps, r12_oWork, and
r12_product in a separate pool. I'm not a database configuration
expert, but it seems sensible to keep your database logging in a
separate pool. I assume that's what r12_logz is? There are some more
details about this in a blog entry
essage
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Grant Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:31:25 AM
Subject: Re: [perf-discuss] Performance issue
Some of this is going t
Some of this is going to echo Bob's thoughts and suggestions.
> > Sun E4500 with Solaris 10, 08/07 release. SAN attached through a
> > Brocade switch to EMC CX700. There is one LUN per file system.
>
> What do you mean by "one LUN per file system"? Do you mean that the
> entire pool is mappe
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Grant Lowe wrote:
>
> Here's my hardware:
>
> Sun E4500 with Solaris 10, 08/07 release. SAN attached through a
> Brocade switch to EMC CX700. There is one LUN per file system.
What do you mean by "one LUN per file system"? Do you mean that the
entire pool is mapped to one
