Re: [perf-discuss] Oracle 10g R1 performs extremely BAD

2008-08-28 Thread Tanel Poder
der http://blog.tanelpoder.com http://n.otepad.com - n.ote this! > -Original Message- > From: Darshak Modi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 21:59 > To: 'Tanel Poder'; perf-discuss@opensolaris.org > Subject: RE: [perf-discuss] Oracle

Re: [perf-discuss] Oracle 10g R1 performs extremely BAD

2008-08-28 Thread Darshak Modi
@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [perf-discuss] Oracle 10g R1 performs extremely BAD On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 06:41:42PM +0530, Darshak Modi wrote: > Hi All, > We are planning to move our application to T2 architecture blades. > When we tried to install Oracle and import the data, it took nearly 5-6 > ho

Re: [perf-discuss] Oracle 10g R1 performs extremely BAD

2008-08-28 Thread Darshak Modi
To: 'Darshak Modi'; perf-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: RE: [perf-discuss] Oracle 10g R1 performs extremely BAD Hi Darshak, The key question is how did you try to import data? 1) Using an Oracle data loading tool or a custom written one? 2) Using only single thread or in parallel?

Re: [perf-discuss] Oracle 10g R1 performs extremely BAD

2008-08-28 Thread Tanel Poder
Hi Darshak, The key question is how did you try to import data? 1) Using an Oracle data loading tool or a custom written one? 2) Using only single thread or in parallel? If only 30 minutes of total 5 hours elapsed time was spent on CPU, the load process was waiting on something a lot. Maybe for

Re: [perf-discuss] Oracle 10g R1 performs extremely BAD

2008-08-28 Thread przemolicc
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 06:41:42PM +0530, Darshak Modi wrote: > Hi All, > We are planning to move our application to T2 architecture blades. > When we tried to install Oracle and import the data, it took nearly 5-6 > hours which on a normal PC takes 30 mins. > The server is 64 threads, 64GB RAM. Th