RE: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size

2006-06-10 Thread Tanel Poder
So what's the problem you're trying to solve? If you simulate any database operation with OS utilities like dd you have to be sure you're simulating it the same way as database does. For example, Oracle opens its filesystem datafiles always with O_SYNC option and with O_DIRECT dependent on whe

Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size

2006-05-02 Thread Roch Bourbonnais - Performance Engineering
I would like to caution people about this conventional wisdom. For UFS the I/O size tunable like maxphys ended up as an important parameter to the write throttle algorithm. The bigger it was the less coupled the application would be to the storage and some important gains could come from that. Sa

Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size

2006-05-01 Thread Richard McDougall
Setting larger maxphys has in my experience made quite a difference, depending on the target. (actually on x64 it makes it slower). Generally, performance increases as the transfer size increases has been my observation, for some classes of targets. This is likely due to the target's ability to se

Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size

2006-03-24 Thread Steven Sim
Richard; Firstly, let me say that I welcome this discussion. I was searching for comments and alternative viewpoints in the first place and at the very least, people in the list and myself can learn and understand the Solaris IO parameters better. I did not make the assumption that maxphys o