Re: [perf-discuss] pipe tests for libMicro

2005-08-10 Thread Alexander Kolbasov
>> - Adding support for ptys as a loopback pipe mechanism. Dan> Can you expand this a little? I'd like to understand better. Dan> Under what conditions is pty performance interesting? Dan> To put it another way, doesn't a pty usually have a (slow) human being at Dan> one en

Re: [perf-discuss] pipe tests for libMicro

2005-08-10 Thread Dan Price
On Tue 09 Aug 2005 at 04:36PM, Alexander Kolbasov wrote: > > - Adding support for ptys as a loopback pipe mechanism. Can you expand this a little? I'd like to understand better. Under what conditions is pty performance interesting? To put it another way, doesn't a pty usually have a (slow) hum

Re: [perf-discuss] pipe tests for libMicro ... and more

2005-08-10 Thread Phil Harman
Yes indeed. Please do share useful extensions like this! Bart and I just don't have the bandwidth (or desire) to do implement all this stuff ourselves (which was a really big motivator in opening libMicro up to the world). Most of the cases you see in libMicro today arose from specific invest

[perf-discuss] pipe tests for libMicro

2005-08-09 Thread Alexander Kolbasov
I think that the pipe test for libMicro can be enhanced a bit by - Adding support for PF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM sockets They are used by various applications and it is interesting to measure performance differencies from other loopback-type transports - Adding support for ptys as a loopback pipe me