Re: [perf-discuss] More findings on poor performance of Xorg

2006-01-11 Thread Josip Gracin
Hi again! I've just installed Firefox 1.5 and those images at www.sun.com work perfectly. So, the problem was not in the X server but in Mozilla that ships with Solaris and in Firefox 1.0.6. ___ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [perf-discuss] More findings on poor performance of Xorg

2006-01-02 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Michael Schulte wrote: do we have X11R6.9 und X11R7.0 coming in the next release of Solaris? The release candidates for X11R6.9 are in Solaris now, starting with 6.9RC2 in Nevada build 28. See the recent post I made to xwin-discuss for more details: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa

Re: [perf-discuss] More findings on poor performance of Xorg

2005-12-26 Thread Michael Schulte
Hey, > Then I tryed with Xsun server, and what do you know, it worked > perfectly! The images were redrawn instantly, with no effect on the > mouse pointer motion. Unfortunately, playing videos is still not > perfect, though it is with much less frame-loss than with Xorg. do we have X11R6.9 un

Re: [perf-discuss] More findings on poor performance of Xorg

2005-12-20 Thread Josip Gracin
Gavin Maltby wrote: For the Nvidia card case - are you using the 'nvidia' driver (from Nvidia, you No, I'm using 'nv' from Xorg. I'll try with Nvidia's driver. Thanks for the suggestion. ___ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [perf-discuss] More findings on poor performance of Xorg

2005-12-20 Thread Gavin Maltby
On 12/18/05 09:50, Josip Gracin wrote: This happens on my Thinkpad R50 with ATI Radeon Mobility 9000. However, the exact same behavior is present on my desktop Athlon64 3000+ with NVidia GeForce 5200 card, first running S10GA and now running SXCE b28, the very latest. Two completely differen

Re: [perf-discuss] More findings on poor performance of Xorg

2005-12-20 Thread Josip Gracin
Alan Coopersmith wrote: The strange part in this is not that X is slow, but that Xorg is slower than Xsun - usually it's the other way around. Which is why I have a feeling the problem is not in deficient implementation, but in misconfiguration. Unless you have an nvidia card with the nv

Re: [perf-discuss] More findings on poor performance of Xorg

2005-12-20 Thread Alan Coopersmith
The strange part in this is not that X is slow, but that Xorg is slower than Xsun - usually it's the other way around. Unless you have an nvidia card with the nvidia accelerated driver though, we currently can't take full advantage of the hardware and lose out on many acceleration opportunties.

[perf-discuss] More findings on poor performance of Xorg

2005-12-18 Thread Philip Beevers
Am I the only one having these problems? Could someone please try www.sun.com and see if the images are being drawn normally, on x86 and Xorg. If so, what kind of graphics card do you have? I'm seeing the same sort of behaviour on an IBM ThinkPad R52 - graphics card is ATI Radeon Mobility X

[perf-discuss] More findings on poor performance of Xorg

2005-12-18 Thread Josip Gracin
Hello! I recently wrote about slow performance of video playback on my Thinkpad R50 notebook running SX 10/05 x86. In the mean time, I made some other experiments and here's what I found. This is not related to playing videos but to simple display of images in Mozilla. The problem is the m