On 11/14/05, Eric Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While it sounds interesting from an academic point of view, I wonder
how relevant this work (and any work related to paging) is when memory
can be purchased for under $200 a gigabyte. This is a different perspective
Memory is cheap, but the syst
Eric Lowe wrote:
While it sounds interesting from an academic point of view, I wonder
how relevant this work (and any work related to paging) is when memory
can be purchased for under $200 a gigabyte.
When we're talking about "green" computing and TB of main memory,
compression and paging optim
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 02:34:46PM -0600, James Dickens wrote:
| > paging candidate determination very costly). ZFS is very fast (being copy-
| > on-write it does sequential I/Os whereas swapfs does random disk access),
| > and it supports compression. ZFS is already slated to become the new
| > re
On 11/14/05, Eric Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 10:28:38AM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote:| Hi,|I've been working on porting the 'compressed cache' feature| (http://linuxcompressed.sourceforge.net/
- feature explained in first few lines)| to linux 2.6 kernel.| I'm wonderi
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 10:28:38AM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote:
| Hi,
|I've been working on porting the 'compressed cache' feature
| (http://linuxcompressed.sourceforge.net/ - feature explained in first few
lines)
| to linux 2.6 kernel.
| I'm wondering why this project is dead even when it show
Hi,
I've been working on porting the 'compressed cache' feature
(http://linuxcompressed.sourceforge.net/ - feature explained in first few lines)
to linux 2.6 kernel.
I'm wondering why this project is dead even when it showed great
performance improvement when system is under memory pressure.
