RE: [perf-discuss] Comments from NUMA observability tools

2005-12-01 Thread Philip Beevers
> You can get the latency information using lgrpinfo -l > command. This will > extract the latency table from the kernel. Note that these > latencies are just > approximation of the real node-to-memory latencies, but they > do give idea of relative latencies. On sparc systems these > latencie

Re: [perf-discuss] Comments from NUMA observability tools

2005-12-01 Thread Alexander Kolbasov
Philip, thank you for your comments! > I have to echo the other positive comments about the lgrp tools. It's > shedding light on a whole area which has previously been difficult to > appreciate. The ideal would be to get some idea via the tools of the latency > penalty of accessing pages across g

RE: [perf-discuss] Comments from NUMA observability tools

2005-11-30 Thread Philip Beevers
n output column on ps(1). > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Alexander Kolbasov > Sent: 15 November 2005 21:16 > To: perf-discuss@opensolaris.org > Subject: [perf-discuss] Comments from NUMA observability tools

[perf-discuss] Comments from NUMA observability tools

2005-11-15 Thread Alexander Kolbasov
We received some internal comments for the NUMA observability tools. Here they are with my comments separated with // lines: - "plgrp -G " returns a number plus an extra blank line. Why the blank line? bug? feature? // Bug - Can you add a flag to up the verbosity? Getting just the lgroup I