Re: [perf-discuss] Syscalls

2012-07-11 Thread przemolicc
Hello, I have setup dtrace script which is run every 10 minutes: 0,10,20,30,40,50 * * * * /root/bin/sum.sh (the dtrace script is below). It runs for 5 min. and saves result in a file (so 5 out of 10 min is recorded) and records the following data: dtrace

Re: [perf-discuss] Syscalls

2012-07-06 Thread przemolicc
"Mike Gerdts" pisze: > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:22 PM, wrote: > > Hello, > > > > we have been observing some high syscalls (much higher then usually) during > > fixed part of week. > > DTrace shows that they mostly comes from Oracle: > > ... > > uname

[perf-discuss] Syscalls

2012-07-06 Thread przemolicc
Hello, we have been observing some high syscalls (much higher then usually) during fixed part of week. DTrace shows that they mostly comes from Oracle: ... uname exece 6788165162 oracle

[perf-discuss] filebench 1.4.8 - file allocation time added to final result ?

2009-10-05 Thread przemolicc
Hi, we are using filebench 1.4.8 to test some storage and we got some strange results. My collegue found that filebench add file creation time to the final result. So the first run gives really bad result (since all the files need to be created) but following runs give much better results becau

Re: [perf-discuss] Tunable parameters for best performance

2009-08-13 Thread przemolicc
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:02:21AM +0530, Reang Su wrote: > Hi All, > > I've SNV_115 installed on 16 core Xeon processor machine with 4GB RAM. > > I need to acheive maximum TCP throughput on 10G Nic. > > Suggest me tunable parameters and its corresponding values. > > What is the alternate of ip

Re: [perf-discuss] [sysadmin-discuss] Opensource tools for storing historic performance data (beyond sar)

2009-02-23 Thread przemolicc
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:36:41PM -0800, Ben Rockwood wrote: > Peter Tribble wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:22 AM, adrian cockcroft > > wrote: > > > >> Don't write yet another performance stats collector / plotter, its been > >> done > >> to death. > >> > > > > It may have been done

Re: [perf-discuss] Oracle 10g R1 performs extremely BAD

2008-08-28 Thread przemolicc
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 06:41:42PM +0530, Darshak Modi wrote: > Hi All, > We are planning to move our application to T2 architecture blades. > When we tried to install Oracle and import the data, it took nearly 5-6 > hours which on a normal PC takes 30 mins. > The server is 64 threads, 64GB RAM. Th

Re: [perf-discuss] find swapping prozess PID

2008-07-01 Thread przemolicc
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 01:50:45AM -0700, Sebastian Fontaine wrote: > Hi, > > on my 1280 with sol10 u4 last patched on february I had 60 swapping Prozesses > found with vmstat. > By restarting some prozesses like apache, rpcbind etc I could eliminate 50%. > Now I have still some left: > > >vmst

Re: [perf-discuss] [storage-discuss] vdbench availability to the general community ?

2008-06-05 Thread przemolicc
intervali/o MB/sec bytes read resp resp respcpu% cpu% rate 1024**2 i/opct time max stddev sys+usr sys 10:06:03.249 12472,4019,328192 76,81 89,473 621,996 127,640 1,7

Re: [perf-discuss] [storage-discuss] vdbench availability to the general community ?

2008-06-04 Thread przemolicc
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:00:02AM -0700, Richard McDougall wrote: > > [...] > It would be interesting to see what parts of the model showed wait-times or > longer latencies -- do you have the output? Is this what you are asking for ? *** FILEBENCH TESTING array-1 Flowop totals: random-rate

Re: [perf-discuss] [storage-discuss] vdbench availability to the general community ?

2008-06-04 Thread przemolicc
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 09:59:56AM -0500, Spencer Shepler wrote: > > On Jun 3, 2008, at 11:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 03:32:47PM -0700, eric kustarz wrote: > >> > >>On May 29, 2008, at 11:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>>[...] > >>> > >>>I remember another ha

Re: [perf-discuss] [storage-discuss] vdbench availability to the general community ?

2008-06-04 Thread przemolicc
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 09:10:22AM -0700, eric kustarz wrote: > > On Jun 3, 2008, at 9:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 03:32:47PM -0700, eric kustarz wrote: > >> > >>On May 29, 2008, at 11:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>>[...] > >>> > >>>I remember another hardwa

Re: [perf-discuss] [storage-discuss] vdbench availability to the general community ?

2008-06-03 Thread przemolicc
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 03:32:47PM -0700, eric kustarz wrote: > > On May 29, 2008, at 11:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >[...] > > > >I remember another hardware arrays (yes, two arrays) test where > >vdbench shows > >that one array is a bit faster (more IOPS) then the other. While > >fileben

Re: [perf-discuss] [storage-discuss] vdbench availability to the general community ?

2008-05-29 Thread przemolicc
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 02:04:21PM -0700, eric kustarz wrote: > > > >Currently both tools gives different view of io. While filebench > >simulates real workload, it cannot show what vdbench shows. > >E.g. we were doing some hardware array tests and it turned out (using > >vdbench) that the array wo

Re: [perf-discuss] [storage-discuss] vdbench availability to the general community ?

2008-05-28 Thread przemolicc
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 08:30:25PM -0700, Brendan Gregg - Sun Microsystems wrote: > There has been a conscious decision to include Filebench in both Solaris > and OpenSolaris under /usr/benchmarks/filebench. If the community is > looking for an IO benchmarking tool, then that should be your first

Re: [perf-discuss] [storage-discuss] vdbench availability to the general community ?

2008-05-28 Thread przemolicc
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:19:59AM -0700, Brendan Gregg - Sun Microsystems wrote: > G'Day All, > > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 08:47:16AM -0700, Neelakanth Nadgir wrote: > > Jeff Cheeney wrote: > > > On 05/27/08 08:39, Wilkinson, Alex wrote: > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> I believe within Sun there is

Re: [perf-discuss] [storage-discuss] vdbench availability to the general community ?

2008-05-27 Thread przemolicc
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:39:53PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote: > Hi all, > > I believe within Sun there is a great IO benchmarking tool called vdbench. > > Is this tool ever going to be opensourced and released to the community ? It has been recently downloable. I am awaiting for the SWAT too

[perf-discuss] FX vs TS scheduler for databases (OLTP)

2008-04-28 Thread przemolicc
Hi all, I have encountered mixed opinions regarding which scheduler is better for OLTP databases (mainly: Oracle). Solaris Internals site http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/FX_For_Databases http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/Application_Specific_Tuning#Tuning_Recommendation

Re: [perf-discuss] Filebench - redo logs placement (OLTP workload)

2008-04-28 Thread przemolicc
Wonderful ! :-) Thanks Richard ! Any timetable to have this patch as part of filebench ? Regards przemol On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 06:56:15AM -0700, Richard McDougall wrote: > FYI - I've made a patch for this as part of my current set of raw-disk > changes... > > > > On Apr 28, 2008, at 0:17,

[perf-discuss] Filebench - redo logs placement (OLTP workload)

2008-04-28 Thread przemolicc
Hi, while running several storage performance tests using filebench (OLTP workload), it occurs to me that it would be good to have ability to put "redo logs" (files used by log writer) on another, separate filesystem. I know that it is perhaps possible by moving (and linking) files created by file

Re: [perf-discuss] Avoiding Garbage Collection

2007-12-29 Thread przemolicc
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 08:44:31AM -0800, Sambasiva Rao Andaluri wrote: > Hi, > We are developing a Java application that consumes real time equity market > data. The application is run on a 2 CPU dual core Opteron box (4 cores with > each 2593Mhz) with about 16GB RAM. The JVM is run in Server mo

Re: [perf-discuss] New FileBench code uploaded to SourceForge

2007-12-13 Thread przemolicc
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:06:53PM -0500, Jonathan Edwards wrote: > but be forewarned - there's no autoconf/autof00 yet, there's still a > nested dependency on the opensolaris tree (../Makefile.cmd, ../../ > Makefile.cmd, ../../Makefile.targ, etc), and there's no Makefile for > common to gener

[perf-discuss] A deeper look into vmstat statistics using DTrace and mdb (sunsolve)

2007-10-02 Thread przemolicc
Hello, there is excellent document at Sunsolve released two days ago about vmstat statistics from DTrace and mdb point of view: http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-25-85499-1 Does anybody know if it is possible to have access to this document for not only Sun's customers but anyb

Re: [perf-discuss] Re: ufs performance

2007-03-22 Thread przemolicc
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:08:03AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, allen mathias wrote: > > >Alex, > > > >yes adding in the -library=stlport4 option does help a lot. Will read the > >manual on why. > > http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/articles/cmp_stlport_libCstd.html