May be a little late but i'll start with mpstat and vmstat. However,
its really a shot in the dark without knowing what your customers are
after.
On 12/11/07, Henrik Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IHAC thats is going to run some stress tests on a pair of Mx000-machines
> and they say the
On 9/21/07, love_code meta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now I 'm testing mmap function, and my pagesize is 4k bytes. After mapping
> 8k virtual memory, by dtrace I find there is only one pagefault when I
> access memory like that s[0] , s[4096].
>
> The following is my test spteps.
> 1. fd = open(
On 9/18/07, love_code meta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After mapping virtual memory, then access data in memory, we know that
> will generate page fault trap if no physical memory page available.
> Is it beneficial that before resuming user program we pre-fetch the addr
> which caused page fault?
On 8/22/07, Peter C. Norton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The swap to zpool idea is very interesting. But this brings up another
> question in the puzzle for us... What is this mythical creature, a
> page size, in the Solaris VM, when it comes to tuning? You have
Here's Richard McDougall's excellen
On 6/18/07, Jean-Francois Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Typically, changing the prstat refresh time doesn't change
anything because the %cpu it is displaying remains the decaying average over
the last minute.
Jean,
You are certainly correct about pcpu. I was hoping that reducing
refresh
On 6/18/07, 陶捷 Euler Tao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ok, i see.
Then, how can I correct this problem when using prstat?
I'd try microstate accounting to see but I'm not sure if it will help.
You could also try to reduce the reporting interval.
Or is there any other statistics tool that could c
On 6/18/07, Wee Yeh Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
prstat may miss
Stupid safari3 is chopping off my post.
prstat may miss short lived processes and this seems possible because
you are compiling stuff.
--
Just me,
Wire ...
Blog:
___
perf-d
On 6/18/07, 陶捷 Euler Tao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear all:
I'm compiling the ON build 65's source code now, using "nightly
opensolaris.sh" command.
The prstat reports that system is very idle, but the load average tells me
that the system is very busy. -,-
And then I check the vmstat report,
On 5/13/07, David Valin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is always amazing how much data you can get out of the system isn't it :).
Anyway we are chewing up a lot of space in the anon part of vm. Willing to try
an experiment? Reboot your system and run memstat before you start anything.
Then
On 5/13/07, Eddy Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello everyone,
Yesterday I installed OpenSolaris for the first time, so excuse me that I'm not
100% familiar with it. I have been using Linux and FreeBSD for a while now
(perhaps 2 years).
After getting my network connection to work, I noticed
On 10/5/06, anuradha moturi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does prstat output for a child process reflect its own resource utilization
or are those stats the same as that of the parent process. I have observed
that the size and rss stats for both parent and child were same, I wanted to
clarify whethe
11 matches
Mail list logo
