+1
Jonathan Chew wrote:
Eric Saxe wrote:
Eric Saxe wrote:
Also, in the past I've acted as de facto facilitator for this
community...but we've never had a vote around that (at least not one
that I remember).
Are you interested Krister? If so, I nominate you. :)
Krister has accepted my nomin
I believe a bug has already been filed on this: 6415113.
As far as details so far, I think we've learned (by asking Colm) that this is a
micro-benchmark for Apache -- it basically tests how fast Apache can serve up a
single static 100 byte file containing all zeros.
Current status: we're setti
Here's some additional info on what Joyent.com is doing (these are the same
people as the textdrive.com people, I believe). Here's the interesting part:
they're using Nevada (Solaris 11) build 31 and ZFS on T1000's (Niagara chipset,
32 threads per chip). And, it's a high throughput Ruby on Ra
I'm a big fan of doing comparative performance tests on [u]identical
hardware[/u]. This eliminates a whole bunch of pesky extraneous variables,
which can mess up (bias) a performance comparison.
My pet peeve: I've seen ads in the past (I won't say which company created
them!) that said "Sola
Hey, it looks like we just published some new MySQL numbers:
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060421/sff024.html?.v=47
Summary: The testing, which measured the performance of both read/write and
read-only operations, showed that MySQL 5.0.18 running on the Solaris(TM) 10
Operating System (OS) e
Good suggestions!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
perf-discuss mailing list
perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
Richard,
Yep, I know there's a pre-built binary (and thank you much for that!)... but I
think that to do open development on filebench (or anything else) in the
community, it needs to be compilable using the resources that most people have.
So, I think that probably means: being able to com
Using gmake seems to help it a lot! It's better now, but not 100% yet.
Here's what I've figured out so far:
1) I overrode MAKE to get gmake, on the configure line. This worked.
2) I can't seem to override CC and CFLAGS at all (overriding them on the
./configure line has no effect), so I had t
Richard,
I'm trying to compile and run just the X86 version, without the Sparc
version, since many in the community do not have Sparc boxen, and (like me)
they'll want to run this just on X86. I got filebench to compile (and
startup), but I can't seem to get it to build a package without the
Nice.
I had some thoughts on this. I noticed that Filebench and libMicro were
similar, but different. I think it would be a Good Idea to converge on a
common output format.
For example, I like the 'tattle' header from libMicro, which tells me
absolutely everything I need to know (hopefull
Ben,
Eric is looking into the limits question, so I hope to see an answer posted
from him soon.
In the mean time, thanks much for the diffs for Darwin! Can I get you to sign
a contributor agreement (located here:
http://opensolaris.org/os/about/sun_contributor_agreement/) and fax it in, so
Good points. I'm guess I'm really arguing that SPEC, TPC, SAP, Oracle Apps,
Manugistics, SAS, etc are all good, real-world tests (and we should run them on
OpenSolaris), but they're not Open tests. Not Open as in "Open Source", but
Open as in "I have access to the tests, and I can run them on
Yes! That's my experience as well -- many benchmarks measure something, but
it's often not clear exactly *what* they measure. Here's an example: several
of the subtests of SPECcpu turn out to be heavily dependent on malloc() -- not
the *performance* of malloc() calls per se (which is what a mi
13 matches
Mail list logo
