Re: [perf-discuss] poor application performance - very high cross-calls

2009-06-29 Thread Matthew Flanagan
Hi Phil, Comments inline. > > > > truss shows writes like this: > > > > /1: write(22, "\0 4\001 :919C\v J H90 b".., 96) > = 96 > : write(23, " %97 *AF", 4) >= 4 > 97 *AF", 4)= 4 > > > > and reads like this: > > /1: read(77, "\0 D\003

Re: [perf-discuss] poor application performance - very high cross-calls

2009-06-29 Thread Matthew Flanagan
`0xfe393bc4 libComUtils.so`T_event_mainloop_iter+0x4c4 libComUtils.so`T_event_mainloop+0x118 libfw1.so`fwd_cmain+0x131c libfw1.so`fw_cmain+0x910 fwd`_start+0x108 226302 > > Hope this helps, > Phil I hope so

Re: [perf-discuss] poor application performance - very high cross-calls

2009-06-29 Thread Matthew Flanagan
> stion): Did you ever apply the Recommended > Patch Cluster ? AFAIK the latest kernel patch is > 137137-09 (see > http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1- > 21-137137-09) > which should fix some issues related to high number > of crosscalls etc. I'm planning to apply the recommended

[perf-discuss] poor application performance - very high cross-calls

2009-06-29 Thread Matthew Flanagan
ducated guess would say that this is the file that reporting server is trying to index. Checking the reporting server confirms this. regards Matthew Flanagan -- http://wadofstuff.blogspot.com -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@opensolaris.org