Re: [perf-discuss] Memory leak somewhere, maybe in libc (libc_hwcap2.so.1 / SXCE b105 x64) ?

Ouch, mistakenly I posted a private response to list. Worst of it: Most URL's are not yet online. More infos at a given time in separate announcements. I apologize to world for this mistake :( %martin ___ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@open

Re: [perf-discuss] Memory leak somewhere, maybe in libc (libc_hwcap2.so.1 / SXCE b105 x64) ?

>> Bob >> == >> Bob Friesenhahn >> bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ >> GraphicsMagick Maintainer,http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ Martin Bochnig, Sun CertifiedSytemAdmin for Solaris 10,

Re: [perf-discuss] Memory leak somewhere, maybe in libc (libc_hwcap2.so.1 / SXCE b105 x64) ?

"some users"? On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > I checked the bug tracker for 'top' and did not see any memory leak bug > listed so I opened up SourceForge bug ID 2593511 so that the top maintainer > is aware of the issue. > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?fun

Re: [perf-discuss] [indiana-discuss] Memory leak somewhere, maybe in libc (libc_hwcap2.so.1 / SXCE b105 x64) ?

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Bart Smaalders wrote: > Martin Bochnig wrote: >> >> Both my version of wget shall have a bug and my version of top? >> Seriously, how likely is this? >> Isn't it more likely that there is a problem in a shared library that >&

Re: [perf-discuss] Memory leak somewhere, maybe in libc (libc_hwcap2.so.1 / SXCE b105 x64) ?

Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > maybe a bug in top ... And well, I would not care about what top does or doesn't report. Problem is: It is not just a game of numbers. This box got unbelievably lluuugiih until I killed most memory-consuming top- and wget-processes. Then things we

Re: [perf-discuss] Memory leak somewhere, maybe in libc (libc_hwcap2.so.1 / SXCE b105 x64) ?

Hi! On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > Your 'top' program obviously has some sort of bug but otherwise I don't see > anything necessarily out of the ordinary in the top listings. Does this explain why a wget process grew to 2.2GB (where I killed it) ?? Then wget must hav

[perf-discuss] Memory leak somewhere, maybe in libc (libc_hwcap2.so.1 / SXCE b105 x64) ?

g their output into text files via wget -m -p -k xxx > logfile.lod 2>&1 & ) http://natamar.org/content/bugs/Screenshot-12.png (image/png) 237K http://natamar.org/content/bugs/Screenshot-14.png (image/png) 239K Normally I would like to have attached them for the records/archives, but

Re: [perf-discuss] performance between Solaris 10 and Solairs Express Build X

> Dear all: > > Will Solaris 10 perform better than Solairs > Express? > For instance: 1) Solaris 10 update 3 vs. Solaris > Express B50, which one performs better? Sorry for telling the truth: Solaris 10/SunOS5.10's kernel is less cpu-hungry, than Solaris 11 aka SXCR/SXDR/Nevada/SunOS5.11's is.