On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 06:18:19PM -0500, Jason King wrote:
> > All other Solaris software still uses the 'old' stability levels. It
> > seems like a mistake to introduce the new ARC nomenclature just for
> > kstats.
>
> That's what I did originally, but then the feedback was 'those aren't
> used
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:46:55PM -0500, Jason King wrote:
> Being distracted by other things for the past few months, I'd like to
> get moving on this again and try to get it knocked out.
>
> To recap, the idea is to associate stability levels to kstats
> analogous to the stability levels assig
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 01:17:39AM -0700, roland wrote:
> and sun has closed the ticket without leaving a comment why this
> is not an issue. (11-Closed:Not a Defect (Closed))
There was a comment placed in a Sun-private section of the bug: sorry
about this, it's against the policy. As the rea
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:46:01AM -0700, Bart Smaalders wrote:
> >http://beaglewiki.org/Main_Page
> >
> >as well as some other GNOME things, apparently.
>
> This cannot scale.
It doesn't necessarily need to scale; from my understanding, Beagle is more
about watching ~/Documents/ than big lots o
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 07:31:08PM -0700, Prakash Sangappa wrote:
> If you where to watch for events on an entire directory tree, what types
> of events that would be?
Presumably there would be some way to specify, but file creation/deletion would
be the most obviously useful events.
> How woul
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 02:44:01PM -0700, Prakash Sangappa wrote:
> FILE_CREATE File/Directory was created.
I think GNOME and others want to be able to watch an entire directory tree. It
sounds like the proposal is that you can only watch a particular path
"/etc/non_existent_file"
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 03:15:16PM -0800, Russ Blaine wrote:
> mechanism itself is also really convoluted
Sure, it's a Pentium 4 :)
> clean, responsible API. You do raise a good point, though, that perhaps
> on Pentium IV we could use PEBS underneath the current proposed APIs to
> deliver rich
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:37:13PM -0800, Russ Blaine wrote:
> CPC in-kernel buffering adds a counter buffer such that the user can
> request the kernel to throw an overflow interrupt when the counter
> buffer overflows.
Has thought been given to the PEBS support in the Pentium IV? The
hardware
