I noticed these Ruby benchmarks on the tech-perform NetBSD mailing list:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-perform/2009/09/03/msg13.html
They're interesting because they compare Linux, NetBSD, FreeBSD, OpenBSD
and OpenSolaris.
- Frank
___
perf-
Frank van der Linden wrote:
It groks the noreturn void exit __P((int)) attribute, e.g.
err.
Pasto. I meant 'the noreturn attribute'.
___
perf-discuss mailing list
perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
Bart Smaalders wrote:
I wish gcc would grok either
#pragma unknown_control_flow(setjmp)
or
extern void longjmp(jmp_buf, int) __NORETURN;
It groks the noreturn void exit __P((int)) attribute, e.g.
void exit(int) __attribute__((__noreturn__));
Looks like uts/common/sys/ccompile.h does the
Bart Smaalders wrote:
libmicro ports very easily; it's a good place to start
Attached is a quick patch to make libmicro compile (and run by the looks
of it, but I haven't tested extensively) on NetBSD.
The missing pthread_*_pshared calls shouldn't matter for NetBSD's
libpthread, I hav
Roman wrote:
Hi, I run both Solaris 10 and NetBSD-current on Ultra 10. What I notice is that
NetBSD performs much faster and Solaris feels quite bloated. Forking new
processes on Solaris is so slow, why is that? Some applications consume a lot
more CPU time on Solaris, compared to the same app
