On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 06:18:19PM -0500, Jason King wrote:
> > All other Solaris software still uses the 'old' stability levels. It
> > seems like a mistake to introduce the new ARC nomenclature just for
> > kstats.
>
> That's what I did originally, but then the feedback was 'those aren't
> used
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 6:19 PM, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:46:55PM -0500, Jason King wrote:
>
>> Being distracted by other things for the past few months, I'd like to
>> get moving on this again and try to get it knocked out.
>>
>> To recap, the idea is to associate stability
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:46:55PM -0500, Jason King wrote:
> Being distracted by other things for the past few months, I'd like to
> get moving on this again and try to get it knocked out.
>
> To recap, the idea is to associate stability levels to kstats
> analogous to the stability levels assig
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Jason King wrote:
>> Being distracted by other things for the past few months, I'd like to
>> get moving on this again and try to get it knocked out.
>>
>> To recap, the idea is to associate stability levels
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Jason King wrote:
> Being distracted by other things for the past few months, I'd like to
> get moving on this again and try to get it knocked out.
>
> To recap, the idea is to associate stability levels to kstats
> analogous to the stability levels assigned to dtr
Jason King wrote:
> To recap, the idea is to associate stability levels to kstats
> analogous to the stability levels assigned to dtrace probes.
>
> Defined stability levels:
> KSTAT_STABILITY_PRIVATE
> KSTAT_STABILITY_VOLATILE
> KSTAT_STABILITY_UNCOMITTED
> KSTAT_STABILITY_COMITT
