Re: [perf-discuss] Slow sftp/scp performance on T2000's

2007-12-13 Thread Mike Gerdts
On Dec 13, 2007 1:46 PM, Philip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On our gigabit network, we're seeing sftp/scp transfer rates of about 3.5mb/s > to T2000's (running Solaris 10), but ftp rates of 42.6mb/s, about twelve > times faster. I'm guessing the difference is encryption overhead. Is there > a

Re: [perf-discuss] Slow sftp/scp performance on T2000's

2007-12-13 Thread William D. Hathaway
Switching from the default 3des algorithm to 'blowfish' should give you another 30-50% speed improvement. scp -c blowfish /the/file $host:/the/file This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [perf-discuss] New FileBench code uploaded to SourceForge

2007-12-13 Thread przemolicc
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:06:53PM -0500, Jonathan Edwards wrote: > but be forewarned - there's no autoconf/autof00 yet, there's still a > nested dependency on the opensolaris tree (../Makefile.cmd, ../../ > Makefile.cmd, ../../Makefile.targ, etc), and there's no Makefile for > common to gener

Re: [perf-discuss] Slow sftp/scp performance on T2000's

2007-12-13 Thread Rayson Ho
I read this a while ago: http://blogs.sun.com/janp/entry/speeding_up_ssh_data_transfer Rayson On Dec 13, 2007 2:46 PM, Philip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On our gigabit network, we're seeing sftp/scp transfer rates of about 3.5mb/s > to T2000's (running Solaris 10), but ftp rates of 42.6mb/s

[perf-discuss] Slow sftp/scp performance on T2000's

2007-12-13 Thread Philip
On our gigabit network, we're seeing sftp/scp transfer rates of about 3.5mb/s to T2000's (running Solaris 10), but ftp rates of 42.6mb/s, about twelve times faster. I'm guessing the difference is encryption overhead. Is there anything I can do to speed up sftp/scp? This message posted from

Re: [perf-discuss] Role of ora_dism pocess in Oracle 10g dynamic memory configuration (ASM

2007-12-13 Thread Glenn Fawcett
In the previous post I said the "ora_dism" process must be run as root in order to dynamically allocate/deallocate ISM segments. This is not correct... It should read: dynamically grow/shrink ISM segments... sorry for any confusion. This message posted from opensolaris.org _

Re: [perf-discuss] New FileBench code uploaded to SourceForge

2007-12-13 Thread Andrew Wilson
Not sure why you can't see it. Just to be sure I tried the link as posted in the reflected message and it worked fine for me. Anyway, for anyone else having problems, go to: SolarisInternals.com Then click on "Filebench News" in the "Recently Updated" column, then on "unification of files and