Re: [perf-discuss] [ksh93-integration-discuss] [osol-code] extremly badperformance of Solaris regex

2007-10-31 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:16:24PM -0400, Glenn Fowler wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 01:04:55PM -0400, Glenn Fowler wrote: > > > > I found RegexTest.java but it takes as input a file of patterns/string > > > > "regex.txt" > ok, I snarfed the subject file > what is the RE? In RegexTes

Re: [perf-discuss] [ksh93-integration-discuss] License stuff... / was: Re: [osol-code]extremly bad performance of Solaris regex

2007-10-31 Thread Roland Mainz
Roland Mainz wrote: > Jens Elkner wrote: > [Please keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the CC: field > for AST/ksh93-related topics since not all people there are subscribed > to all other opensolaris-org lists, too] > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 01:25:36AM -0400, Peter Memishian wrote: > > > > /usr/lib/libas

Re: [perf-discuss] Project proposal: "Solaris Enhancements forAMD-based Platforms"

2007-10-31 Thread Roland Mainz
"Ostrovsky, Boris" wrote: > I would like to propose creation of a new project titled "Solaris > Enhancements for AMD-based Platforms". > > The project will address various features that are specific to platforms > based on AMD processors, such as > - IOMMU support > - NUMA topology

Re: [perf-discuss] [osol-code] extremly bad performance of Solarisregex

2007-10-31 Thread Roland Mainz
Fintan Ryan wrote: [Please keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the CC: field for AST-related topics since not all people there are subscribed to all other opensolaris-org lists, too] > >>> Linux i6860.704u 0.004s 0:00.70 100.0%5587 ms > >>> 2079.593 > >> 1. Which locale do you use ? >

Re: [perf-discuss] [osol-code] extremly bad performance of Solaris regex

2007-10-31 Thread Fintan Ryan
Hi, >>> Linux i6860.704u 0.004s 0:00.70 100.0%5587 ms 2079.593 >> 1. Which locale do you use ? > > LC_CTYPE is set to en_US and LC_LANG/LC_ALL are unset. So I assume > 'en_US'. > Can you try using the C locale, en_US is now a utf8 locale afaik, the I18N folks would be abl

Re: [perf-discuss] [osol-code] [ksh93-integration-discuss] extremly badperformance of Solaris regex

2007-10-31 Thread Roland Mainz
Jens Elkner wrote: [Please keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the CC: field for AST-related topics since not all people there are subscribed to all other opensolaris-org lists, too] > On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 01:04:55PM -0400, Glenn Fowler wrote: > > > Jens Elkner wrote: > > > > regex.c

[perf-discuss] License stuff... / was: Re: [osol-code] extremly bad performance of Solaris regex

2007-10-31 Thread Roland Mainz
Jens Elkner wrote: [Please keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the CC: field for AST/ksh93-related topics since not all people there are subscribed to all other opensolaris-org lists, too] > On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 01:25:36AM -0400, Peter Memishian wrote: > > > /usr/lib/libast.so.1 before you can link with

Re: [perf-discuss] [osol-code] extremly bad performance of Solaris regex

2007-10-31 Thread Roland Mainz
Hi! [Please keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the CC: field for AST-related topics since not all people there are subscribed to all other opensolaris-org lists, too] Jens Elkner wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 06:20:02AM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote: > > Jens Elkner wrote: > > [CC:'ing [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [perf-discuss] extremly bad performance of Solaris regex

2007-10-31 Thread Ienup Sung
> regex.c > RegexTest.javaMHz > 0.01s 0:13.17 99.6%5569 ms 1503 > Solaris x86 6.28u 0.00s 0:06.29 99.8% >2571 ms 2813 > ux i6860.704u 0.004s 0:00.70 100.0%5587 > ms 2079.593 > > Summary: > - Java Regex on Sol

Re: [perf-discuss] two filebench questions

2007-10-31 Thread eric kustarz
hey Marion, If you need just the binaries for 1.0.0, then you can either simply upgrade to the latest ON build (76+) or if you download the source and build it, then you'll create the package (SUNWfilebench) yourself. Sorry for the delay, but we do have someone cleaning up the Makefiles/puttin

Re: [perf-discuss] filesize incorrect

2007-10-31 Thread eric kustarz
Isn't this a bug in the workload definition? filemicro_seqread.f specifies the file you're sequentially reading as a fileset: " define fileset name=bigfileset,path=$dir,size=$filesize,entries=$nthreads,dirwidth=1024,prealloc=100,cached=$cached " I believe that should be a 'file' - much like sing

Re: [perf-discuss] [ksh93-integration-discuss] [osol-code] extremly bad performance of Solaris regex

2007-10-31 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 01:04:55PM -0400, Glenn Fowler wrote: Hi Glenn, > > Jens Elkner wrote: > > > regex.c RegexTest.javaMHz > > > Solaris sparc13.12u 0.01s 0:13.17 99.6%5569 ms 1503 > > > Solaris x86 6.28u 0.00s 0:06.29

Re: [perf-discuss] [osol-code] [ksh93-integration-discuss] extremly bad performance of Solaris regex

2007-10-31 Thread Jens Elkner
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:07:41PM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > Don't most 3rd party software apps use a version of either GNU regex or > perl regex? AFAIK they usually use the system's regex, since usually faster. I think, one year ago, I also checked out pcre without getting something better

Re: [perf-discuss] [osol-code] extremly bad performance of Solaris regex

2007-10-31 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 01:25:36AM -0400, Peter Memishian wrote: > > > /usr/lib/libast.so.1 before you can link with libast via -last > > ... and in case it's not obvious from the issues linking via -last, this > is not a public API as far as Solaris is concerned yet. No problem. I'm using the

Re: [perf-discuss] [osol-code] extremly bad performance of Solaris regex

2007-10-31 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 06:20:02AM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote: > Jens Elkner wrote: > [CC:'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] since libast belongs > to this project] > > > > regex.c RegexTest.javaMHz > > Solaris sparc13.12u 0.01s 0:13.17 99.6%5569 ms