On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 05:34:38PM +0200, Roch - PAE wrote:
>
> adrian cockcroft writes:
> > Why can't you adapt ZFS for swap? It does the transactional clustering of
> > random writes into sequential related blocks, aggressive prefetch on read,
> > and would also guard against corrupt blocks i
Peter:
Would you describe your swap configuration? The output from df -hlk and
swap -l would be helpful.
Thanks,
-j
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 08:17:05AM -0700, Peter C. Norton wrote:
> We use solaris 10 at my company, but I noticed this behavior is the
> same/worse on sxde, and I wanted to know i
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 17:34 +0200, Roch - PAE wrote:
> adrian cockcroft writes:
> > Why can't you adapt ZFS for swap? It does the transactional clustering of
> > random writes into sequential related blocks, aggressive prefetch on read,
> > and would also guard against corrupt blocks in swap. A
adrian cockcroft wrote:
> Why can't you adapt ZFS for swap? It does the transactional clustering
> of random writes into sequential related blocks, aggressive prefetch on
> read, and would also guard against corrupt blocks in swap. Anon-ZFS?
This is planned as part of the VM 2.0 project. Note t
adrian cockcroft writes:
> Why can't you adapt ZFS for swap? It does the transactional clustering of
> random writes into sequential related blocks, aggressive prefetch on read,
> and would also guard against corrupt blocks in swap. Anon-ZFS?
> Adrian
Good point. And It works already, swap to
On Aug 21, 2007, at 8:58 AM, adrian cockcroft wrote:
Why can't you adapt ZFS for swap? It does the transactional
clustering of random writes into sequential related blocks,
aggressive prefetch on read, and would also guard against corrupt
blocks in swap. Anon-ZFS?
why not use a very smal
Why can't you adapt ZFS for swap? It does the transactional clustering of
random writes into sequential related blocks, aggressive prefetch on read,
and would also guard against corrupt blocks in swap. Anon-ZFS?
Adrian
___
perf-discuss mailing list
perf-d
adrian cockcroft writes:
> I think this is a good forum to discuss a systematic performance issue with
> swap. The problem has been there for a long time, I tried to get people
> interested in doing something about it around ten years ago, I left Sun in
> 2004 and don't even use Sun's at my c
