[perf-discuss] Re: filebench: stats not working?

2007-03-22 Thread Gerard Henry
13591: 33892.920: IO Summary: 86377 ops 1426.8 ops/s, (220/220 r/w) 7.2mb/s,202us cpu/op, 36.1ms latency 13591: 33892.920: Shutting down processes filebench> stats dump 'stats.varmail' 13591: 33924.574: Illegal character at ''' on line 53 13591: 33924.575: syntax error at 'stats.varma

[perf-discuss] Re: filebench: stats not working?

2007-03-22 Thread Richard J. McDougall
You may use quotes around the filename to resolve this issue. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [perf-discuss] Project endorsement request: Enhance Solaris for Intel Project

2007-03-22 Thread johansen-osdev
I second Bart's endorsement, if it matters. -j On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:59:14PM -0700, Bart Smaalders wrote: > Eric Saxe wrote: > >I'd like to request endorsement from the performance community for the > >"Enable/enhance Solaris support for Intel Project". > >http://www.opensolaris.org/os/proj

Re: [perf-discuss] Project endorsement request: Enhance Solaris for Intel Project

2007-03-22 Thread Bart Smaalders
Eric Saxe wrote: I'd like to request endorsement from the performance community for the "Enable/enhance Solaris support for Intel Project". http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/intel-platform/ Intel specific performance enhancement is a core area of focus for the project. http://www.opensola

[perf-discuss] Project endorsement request: Enhance Solaris for Intel Project

2007-03-22 Thread Eric Saxe
I'd like to request endorsement from the performance community for the "Enable/enhance Solaris support for Intel Project". http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/intel-platform/ Intel specific performance enhancement is a core area of focus for the project. http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project

Re: [perf-discuss] Re: ufs performance

2007-03-22 Thread Steve Clamage
In the compiler group, we think about migration issues every day. We have a plan for a future major release that will fix all known ABI bugs and provide a new C++ standard library as well. (The C++ standard library is part of the C++ ABI.) A new C++ standard that will force binary incompatibil

[perf-discuss] filebench: stats not working?

2007-03-22 Thread Gerard Henry
with all versions (sources files filebench1.64.3_s10_x86_sparc_PRERELEASE_pkg and 1.64.5), i'm unable to get stats: IO Summary: 35934 ops 596.1 ops/s, (92/92 r/w) 3.0mb/s,795us cpu/op, 85.7ms latency 14461: 98.778: Shutting down processes filebench> stats dump stats.varmail 14461: 21

Re: [perf-discuss] filebench on soalris 9 not working: libm.so.2: open failed

2007-03-22 Thread Gérard Henry
Neelakanth Nadgir wrote: Gérard, You could use filebench without making a package. Just make sure /opt/filebench/workloads is a soft link to the workloads directory in your src distribution. I generally do ./filebench ... load varmail ... run 120 ... ok, it works, but i also make modifica

Re: [perf-discuss] Re: ufs performance

2007-03-22 Thread Bart Smaalders
Dan Price wrote: On Thu 22 Mar 2007 at 08:44AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you run your two variants under truss -c, you may see that under CC this seems to generate an excess of lseek's. I'm not sure why: This is the problem with the default C++ library, I believe. You're right. That wor

Re: [perf-discuss] filebench on soalris 9 not working: libm.so.2: open failed

2007-03-22 Thread Neelakanth Nadgir
Gérard, You could use filebench without making a package. Just make sure /opt/filebench/workloads is a soft link to the workloads directory in your src distribution. I generally do ./filebench ... >load varmail ... >run 120 ... hth, -neel On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:57 PM +0100, Gérard Henry wrot

Re: [perf-discuss] filebench on soalris 9 not working: libm.so.2: open failed

2007-03-22 Thread Gérard Henry
Gérard Henry wrote: any chance to have it compiled on solaris 9 or 8? ok, compilation succeed if using bison and flex from blastwave! but package failed, it seems that it is impossible to make package from source files: ## Building pkgmap from package prototype file. ERROR in prototype:

Re: [perf-discuss] filebench on soalris 9 not working: libm.so.2: open failed

2007-03-22 Thread Gérard Henry
Gérard Henry wrote: ok, i'm trying to compile from sources files, but it failed: make package ... ... source='fileset.c' object='fileset.o' libtool=no \ depfile='.deps/fileset.Po' tmpdepfile='.deps/fileset.TPo' \ depmode=none /bin/bash ../config/depcomp \ cc -D_REENTRANT -I. -I. -I.. -I../intl

Re: [perf-discuss] filebench on soalris 9 not working: libm.so.2: open failed

2007-03-22 Thread Gérard Henry
ok, i'm trying to compile from sources files, but it failed: make package ... ... source='fileset.c' object='fileset.o' libtool=no \ depfile='.deps/fileset.Po' tmpdepfile='.deps/fileset.TPo' \ depmode=none /bin/bash ../config/depcomp \ cc -D_REENTRANT -I. -I. -I.. -I../intl -I../solaris/gsl-1.4

Re: [perf-discuss] filebench on soalris 9 not working: libm.so.2: open failed

2007-03-22 Thread Alexander . Gorshenev
This is usually happens when one runs Sol10 compiled binaries on a Sol9. Alexander On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Gerard Henry wrote: hello all, i want to use filebench to compare my actual mail server (sun v120, solaris 9) ans sun t2000 on t2000, filebench (varmail) gave me: IO Summary: 50937 op

[perf-discuss] filebench on soalris 9 not working: libm.so.2: open failed

2007-03-22 Thread Gerard Henry
hello all, i want to use filebench to compare my actual mail server (sun v120, solaris 9) ans sun t2000 on t2000, filebench (varmail) gave me: IO Summary: 50937 ops 840.6 ops/s, (129/129 r/w) 4.3mb/s,780us cpu/op, 61.1ms latency but on v120, after installing, i'm unable to execute: %

Re: [perf-discuss] Re: ufs performance

2007-03-22 Thread przemolicc
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:08:03AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, allen mathias wrote: > > >Alex, > > > >yes adding in the -library=stlport4 option does help a lot. Will read the > >manual on why. > > http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/articles/cmp_stlport_libCstd.html