Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size

2006-05-02 Thread Roch Bourbonnais - Performance Engineering
I would like to caution people about this conventional wisdom. For UFS the I/O size tunable like maxphys ended up as an important parameter to the write throttle algorithm. The bigger it was the less coupled the application would be to the storage and some important gains could come from that. Sa

Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Code review for the "sticky scheduler" changes

2006-05-02 Thread Holger Berger
On 4/25/06, Eric C. Saxe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you have the bug# around for these problems? 6417367 cpu_wakeup() could be more locality/CMT aware 4933914 scheduler support for shared cache CMT processors Thank you. Holger ___ perf-discuss

[perf-discuss] Footprint of OpenSolaris

2006-05-02 Thread Louwtjie Burger
Hi Could someone please comment on: 1. Disk usage after a default install (build >30) in MB (ex studio and src) 2. Memory footprint (X not started ie command-line logon...build >30) in MB Thank you PS: I only have builds < 30 ... This message posted from opensolaris.org ___