Re: [perf-discuss] multiview improvements

2005-08-18 Thread Dan Price
On Thu 18 Aug 2005 at 09:27PM, Robert W. Fuller wrote: > Uhh dare I ask What is multiview? Does someone have a link? > > Dan Price wrote: Sorry. It's part of libMicro. http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/performance/libmicro/ It's a scary awk script which outputs web pages like: htt

Re: [perf-discuss] multiview improvements

2005-08-18 Thread Robert W. Fuller
Uhh dare I ask What is multiview? Does someone have a link? Dan Price wrote: > --- multiview Wed Aug 17 19:20:09 2005 > +++ multiview.new Thu Aug 18 11:05:30 2005 > @@ -76,12 +76,20 @@ > } ___ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@ope

Re: [perf-discuss] libMicro running on Darwin

2005-08-18 Thread Phil Harman
libMicro knows of two barrier synchronisation methods. The prefered method requires the platform to provide PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED mutexes and condvars. Until recently (e.g. with the NPTL) Linux didn't support this, so I implemented a SysV semop version as well. The default build uses a shared

[perf-discuss] multiview improvements

2005-08-18 Thread Dan Price
(Whenever I hear "multiview" I can't help but think of a pinball game I used to play which had a voice which would, at the appropriate moment, yell in a hacky transylvanian accent: "multiball -- MultiBall -- MULTIBALL -- HAHAHAHA!") Anyway, here are some diffs to fix a number of html problems; th

Re: [perf-discuss] libMicro: longjmp and siglongjmp seem to stuck

2005-08-18 Thread Dan Price
On Thu 18 Aug 2005 at 04:33AM, Alexey Roytman wrote: > The libMicro on the following Solaris versions (uname -a): > SunOS shemesh 5.11 snv_15 i86pc i386 i86pc > SunOS maadim 5.10 Generic i86pc i386 i86pc > When running "./bench > out.txt", the tests longjmp and siglongjmp eat CPU > but does no

Re: DEBUG vs. non-DEBUG comparo (was Re: [perf-discuss] strange libmicro math)

2005-08-18 Thread Gavin Maltby
On 08/18/05 08:17, Jonathan Adams wrote: This is very cool; one additional point of interest might be "non-DEBUG w/ kmem_flags = f", so that the kmem debugging overhead can be factored out. I put a TRAPTRACE-only build (a small part of DEBUG) through Perfpit a while back to judge the impact o

[perf-discuss] Re: libMicro: longjmp and siglongjmp compiled by gcc 3.4.3 seem to stuck

2005-08-18 Thread Alexey Roytman
Why don't I see the replies here (I get them by email)? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@opensolaris.org

[perf-discuss] Re: FileBench Discuss

2005-08-18 Thread Brendan Gregg
G'Day Folks, FileBench looks great. I've been wanting to write such a tool for a while, but this is far more comprehensive than I was planning. :) Apart from it's own output, which is terribly useful, I've been using it to generate test load for other tools: random uncached 8k reads: $ iostat

[perf-discuss] libMicro: longjmp and siglongjmp seem to stuck

2005-08-18 Thread Alexey Roytman
The libMicro on the following Solaris versions (uname -a): SunOS shemesh 5.11 snv_15 i86pc i386 i86pc SunOS maadim 5.10 Generic i86pc i386 i86pc When running "./bench > out.txt", the tests longjmp and siglongjmp eat CPU but does not finish after 15 minutes of CPU eaten. Two consecutive pstac

Re: DEBUG vs. non-DEBUG comparo (was Re: [perf-discuss] strange libmicro math)

2005-08-18 Thread Jonathan Adams
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 07:04:52PM -0700, Dan Price wrote: > > [resend, fixing attachment] > > Ok. Attached is a preliminary DEBUG vs. non-DEBUG comparison; I > eliminated the one test which was very obviously misfiring. It could be > that there are others which are also misbehaving. > > For t