J and K Messervy wrote:
>We've had a lot of thunderstorms in the last two weeks and I've spent a lot
>of time and effort trying to get some good lightning shots. I've been
>frustrated by being in the wrong spot, just missing shots, having the wrong
>settings, etc.
>
>Well, last night we had a
scene itself was so "blingy" that someone of lesser talents and the
op to stand where you were
standing would have taken the shot too.
I like your subtle snow shots lots better.
ann
Tom C wrote:
>>From: ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>>Now I
Brendan MacRae wrote:
>--- ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>>http://www.primelensphoto.com/bulb.jpg
>>>
>>>K10D + A*85mm f1.4, Av mode, ISO 100, f11, +2EV,
>>>1/180, (2X)540 flashes + manual white ba
I did the autosubmit without incident a couple of days ago - at least I
think I did! :)
ann
P. J. Alling wrote:
>Yes. Once Jostein fixed the page problem I had no problem. Try the
>e-mail method It's described about 2/3rd's of the way down this page.
>
>http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosu
Walter Hamler wrote:
>http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Cormorantweb.jpg
>
>http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/FoggySunriseweb.jpg
>
>http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Jaguarweb.jpg
>
>Went on a shoot yesterday to a nearby wetlands. Shot a few birds, etc
Jan van Wijk wrote:
>On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:38:51 -0800 (PST), Rick Womer wrote:
>
>>What a great gallery!
>>
>>
>Indeed!
>
>>One of the things I love about the PUG is that most of
>>the photos are from people who never post on the PDML.
>>It would be fun to hear from them here.
>>
>>
>He,
Mark Roberts wrote:
>K.Takeshita wrote:
>
>
>
>>Despite the argument that pop-ups are useless and pro-gears
>>should not have them etc, I think it's useful if you know when to
>>use it.
>>
>>
>
>You bet. When hiking trails with a full pack of camping gear, I usually
>don't pack a flash as
So now I'm signed up on smugmug -
when quickly uploaded my ashley calendar pics and chose smugmug
watermark I got a
large and too concealing "proof" across the center of the image...
one is permitted to use one's own watermark
which I figure I would like to just be my copyright very faint along t
ttp://homepage.mac.com/godders/tp-2271.jpg
>
>Aside from the content of the watermark and the style you want to
>use, if you need to watermark a bunch of existing JPEGs, various have
>recommended iWatermark in the past.
> http://www.scriptsoftware.com/iwatermark/
>I've
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Yup, I got Stan's ticket (Thanks, Stan.). Batten down the hatches the
>Californians are coming. Well, one is, anyway.
>
yayayay! girl power!
>
>Now I just have to figure out how I am getting there and where I will stay.
>
>Looks as if I book a plane ticket now, this
Mark Roberts wrote:
>ann sanfedele wrote:
>
>
>
>>Bring ear plugs if you are an early to bedder
>>
>>
>
>Won't help. Dave Brooks triggers seismographs.
>
>
>
>
Oh I wasn't just thinking of chain saw - I remember the previous year
Rick Womer wrote:
>Under the circumstances described, those 11 people
>would have +ASCENDED+ into puns!
>
especially if one were the butt of the jokes
(ann ducks)
>
>--- Stan Halpin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[snip]
>
>
>>11 to descend into puns on light, bulb, and related
>>terms. ["It woul
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>On Mar 2, 2007, at 1:08 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
>
>>... I didn't think of watermarks as copyright info, though, just as
>>something that would appear
>>when someone tried to print you images and make them funky as a
>>resu
Nick Wright wrote:
>Ann, I've been playing with different watermarks lately too.
>
>I'm a subscriber of PhotoShelter which sounds much like SmugMug. At
>least in allowing you to specify a watermark and them automatically
>putting on when you upload photos.
>
>Just this past week, I decided to go w
cbwaters wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "ann sanfedele" <>
>
>
>>But you probably got more sleep off the mountain :) :) Bring ear plugs
>>if you are an early to bedder
>>
>>ann
>>
>>
>
>I knew a girl like
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>I'm somewhat surprised that there was no response to my post of a
>picture of a woman in what coucl be called an aniti-social environment.
>It's not unlike an Arbus pic, although not as well executed perhaps.
>Is the total silence due to the content or the execution? Or
8
>
>-Oprindelig meddelelse-
>Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af ann
>sanfedele
>Sendt: 2. marts 2007 20:03
>Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Emne: watermarking
>
>
>So now I'm signed up on smugmug -
>when quickly uploaded my ashl
Bob W wrote:
>Hi,
>
>here is a little gallery of photos from my trip this week to Staithes
>and the cliffs round about:
>
>http://www.web-options.com/photos/
>
>
>
This one is my fave, bob
http://www.web-options.com/photos/content/_2273693_large.html
I'd like a teensy bit less sky in it -- but
Jens, that was Dave Brooks who had seen his work ripped off in reply to
Marnie, who doesn't use watermarks (yet)
..sometimes interweaving responses gets confusing!)
I stayed up until 3 am last night working on my new web site for photos
on smugmug
I really love the site... a bit of frustration a
Bob W wrote:
>Thanks Ann. It's only 28mm equivalent, so not a particularly extreme
>wide angle. I think the shape of the beck, the downward viewpoint and
>the roundness of the hill make an oval, which exaggerates the effect.
>
ah, almost an oxbow in the river - I see
>
>If you do get the chance t
Jens Bladt wrote:
>Ann, you are right. I got confused.
>Your watermark is nice - descreete and still informative. But I doubt it
>would prevent any possible theft of your images.
>I know some of mine have actually ended up on web sites for musicians and
>other stuff. But it's not such a big deal.
Fiso_PENTAX wrote:
>Hello Ann,
>
>I love your photos and never miss the possibilities to look at them...
>or download them...
>
>
thanks, Fiso!
>>I stayed up until 3 am last night working on my new web site for photos
>>on smugmug
>>I really love the site... a bit of frustration at first, but n
to the whole site
Ann
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
>ann sanfedele
>Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 5:46 PM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: watermarking
>
>
>Jens, that was Dave Brooks wh
Bob W wrote:
>I'm looking forward to seeing more. The Paris and the Kansas pictures
>are very striking.
>
>--
> Bob
>
>
>
Thanks, Bob but
>
>
Kansas?
I don't think we're in Kansas anymore, Toto :)
The one with the Georgia O'keefe sky is actually in Nevada outside of Reno -
Ah , it's jus
Bob W wrote:
>I mean Nevada. I guess it's not in Kansas any more...
>
>--
> Bob
>
>
hehe see my reply before I saw this one
a
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Bob W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: 04 March 2007 23:08
>>To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
>>Subject: RE: watermarking
>>
>>
Doug Franklin wrote:
>Nick Wright wrote:
>
>
>>Honestly, how dangerous do you all think it is to use a real signature
>>as a copyright symbol on photos?
>>
>>
>
>I don't know, but I'm not going to be an early adopter on that one.
>
>
>
I really _don't_ think it is a good idea with the amou
I should not even lurk --
I'm up to my eyeballs, suddenly , in things I need to do to feed myself
and my landlord :)
I just deleted 5 days of PDML unread - so if you responded to any
comments I may have
made about something, forgive, I jsut didn't see it
If ya go something really important to t
Mark Roberts wrote:
>ann sanfedele wrote:
>
>
>
>>love ya all, but gotta eat
>>
>>
>
>Are we really bad anough to spoil your appetite?
>;-)
>
>
>
unfortunately, not enough spoils my appetite these days lol!
a
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Scott Loveless wrote:
>Who's going? I need a rough estimate.
>
>
>
Well of course you know I am Scott!
I just hopped back on list again to see the gfm subject line
tally one
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
LOL --
some of us have too much time on thier hands :)
ann
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>Photography can pose moral dilemmas. When does one shoot, and when does
>one put the camera down? Recently, I had to choose whether or not I
>should chronicle the passing of someone who had become my friend. He
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In a message dated 3/12/2007 8:27:28 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Who's going? I need a rough estimate.
>
>===
>Why? You buying pizza?
>
>Me.
>
>Marnie aka Doe :-)
>
Ohmygod - the Pizza! What a great year that was ! :)
ann
Cotty wrote:
>On 13/3/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>
>>I might be riding the VFR to the mountain this year. My S.O. wants to
>>come, but she'll be a couple of days behind me. So if she drives the
>>car I'll have to find another means of transport (I don't think Dave's
>>t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Personally, I've always liked DST a great deal. I like having more light at
>night, I hate it when it gets dark at 5pm, and I look forward to it.
>
>Thanks for the reminder, Graywolf.
>
>Marnie aka Doe
>
>** AOL now offers free
>
Kenneth Waller wrote:
>I'll be pulling into Banner Elk on Thursday 5/21.
>
>Kenneth Waller
>
That's real early! or did you mean 5/31 ?? :)
ann - whose arrival time and date will depend on Scott L.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: GFM 2007
>
>
>
Walter Hamler wrote:
>I need a macro lens. Don't want to spend the bucks for the latest Pentax AF,
>for that matter I think I would prefer a MF version. KEH has some 100mm f/4
>in different versions, one being an A model. They also have a Sigma 90mm
>f/2.8 A .
>Anyone know anything about these
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>You wouldn't stoop to turning this sensitive memorial into yet another
>pun thread, would you? That's cold man, really cold.:-)
>Paul
>On Mar 13, 2007, at 3:30 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
>
>
>
>>Good thing you had a chance to freeze the action of your friend, for
>>prosper
Re the Pentax Gallery
Question one -
is there a deadline?
Question 2
exif is an acronym for ? exposure information? or a specific KIND of info?
In photoshop elements, when I fill out "file info" there is a form to
fill out before saving.
IF I put a caption in there iwhen I load stuff to smugm
Cotty wrote:
>On 13/3/07, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>
>>So you are bringing the pizza Cotty??
>>
>>
>
>Nope, but I know a man who's gonna rustle you up something loverly :-)
>
>
m can't wait!
later
a
>
&
Christian wrote:
>Scott Loveless wrote:
>
>
>>Who's going? I need a rough estimate.
>>
>>
>>
>
>I'm not going, but I am playing airport shuttle service to some big,
>bald, English dude named Steve who IS going.
>
>DCPDMLers, get ready for an event near the end of May, just before GFM :-)
>
Cotty wrote:
>On 14/3/07, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>
>>Tom Reese and Susan
>>
>>
>
>hey Tom, you bringing any Darkside gear? hilk hilk
>
>
>
I don't know about Tom, but I got my darkside rebel and might bring the
pro-1 too.
what I don't have is a laptop.
I hope s
David J Brooks wrote:
>I quess Australian photog's do fill flash all the time then.
>
>:-)
>
>Dave
>
>On 3/11/07, Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>On a Danish website I read that for fill flash purposes, it may be
>>adviceable to turn the camera upside down. This wasy it's easy to bri
Dashing through the list -- i say "COLOR"
ann
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>I'm having a tough time deciding which way to go on this one:
>BW:
>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5716008
>
>Color:
>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5708787
>
>
>This is multiple frame, continuous aut
Got box of five rolls, but it is out dated...
box is stamped "0581 003 02/2004"
Is this of any use to anyone?
I grabbed it at a local thrift in a moment of weakness...
I seem to remember shooting out of date tri-x and managed to
get fair negs out of it if I upped the contrast factors. but thi
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>Thanks, dashing Annsan.
>Paul
>
sweet talker!
a
>On Mar 14, 2007, at 6:05 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
>
>
>>Dashing through the list -- i say "COLOR"
>>ann
>>
>>
>>Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>
>>
tress city -
I can't control it... my hands just don't work that way.
ann the ludite
Cotty wrote:
>On 14/3/07, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>
>>I hope someone will let me use their adobe photoshop 5.0 and has or can
>>let me load my
>>cano
John -- of course when I read your subject line what passed through my
mind first
was - um - "It happened one Night" or "the 39 Steps" :)
ann
John Celio wrote:
>At an antique/flea market I stumbled upon last sunday, I found a box of six
>rolls of "panchromatic Hit film." Here's a box just
Juan Buhler wrote:
>Interesting what happens when something interesting is going on behind
>you. You can be really close and stillnot be seen:
>
>http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=727
>
>(K10D, 16-45/4 at 16mm)
>
>All comments appreciated!
>
>j
>
>
>
nice grab, Juan - but I think
Peter Lacus wrote:
>Hello Markus,
>
>
>
>>I would not call it a masterpiece because of the cut off feet and the
>>distortions in the background and the ugly car on the right side but the
>>expression on the faces and the moment itself are indeed very well seen and
>>captured. Somehow the critics
t time a bit
>for the first test. Then adjust off that.
>
>Good luck -
>
>MCC
>
>ann sanfedele wrote:
>
>
>>Got box of five rolls, but it is out dated...
>>box is stamped "0581 003 02/2004"
>>
>>Is this of any use to anyone?
>>I
a photo in photoshop and is recognized as a caption by places like my
smugmug.
Ah - now I just opened that area in elements 5.0 and ca-chung!
down at the bottom it says "powered by XMP" never noticed
that before.
ann
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>On Mar 14, 2007, at 10:54 AM, ann sanfed
d won't have to pester anyone.
Thanks, John
ann
>
>
>On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:39:13PM -0400, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
>
>>Welll I got software with the Canon through which I load the pics -
>>don't have a card reader, actually
>>
>>I di
David J Brooks wrote:
>On 3/14/07, ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Welll I got software with the Canon through which I load the pics -
>>don't have a card reader, actually
>>
>>
>
>There will be tons at the mountain i'
Now we're cookin! That is exactly what I wanted to know.
thanks again Godders sorry to the list for leaving all the info in but
that is my filing system
for reference (I NEVER delete the "sent mail" folder)
Best,
ann
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>On Mar 14, 2007, at 8:42 PM, a
David Savage wrote:
>At 11:59 AM 15/03/2007, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
>
>>John -- of course when I read your subject line what passed through my
>>mind first
>>was - um - "It happened one Night" or "the 39 Steps" :)
>>
>>ann
>>
I went to the link Gooders pointed me to and saw no way to create an
artist number -
So I wrote them - but haven't heard back yet...
Just skimming I see you need flash to view the stuff? Feh.
ann
Jack Davis wrote:
>I think it was Bruce who passed along a response from Pentax re the
>frustratio
beta" ;)
ann
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
>David J Brooks
>Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 5:52 PM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Response
>
>
>You need to request the artist number An
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In a message dated 3/12/2007 4:54:07 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>That really shouldn't be that funny...
>
>Bruce Dayton wrote:
>
>
>>It really sucks to have to reply to yourself to fix some stupidity. I
>>guess it would be better to hav
Tom C wrote:
>Just floating this out there for comments. I like it because of the
>lighting. I can tend to get jaded because I see this fairly often.
>
>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5720145&size=lg
>
>Tom C.
>
>
>
>
Yawn... so boring, see it every day, ho hum :)
I wish I c
David J Brooks wrote:
>You need to request the artist number Ann. Mine took a bout 24 hours.
>
>Dave
>
Thats what I did... no response yet
ann
>
>On 3/15/07, ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>I went to the link Gooders pointed me to and saw
Bruce Dayton wrote:
>Hello Tom,
>
>I think it is pretty cool. Being jaded with the area you live in is a
>common problem. No matter where it is, we get so used to it.
>
>I have some friends who grew up in northern California in the heart of
>redwood country. I love to go up there to be among th
P. J. Alling wrote:
>Where are you going to find Buoys on a mountain
>
where the guls are
a
>
>Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>
>>Norm Baugher wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>We need to put up the same sign at PDML central and just get rid of the
>>>"NO"s.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>http://www.robertstech
David J Brooks wrote:
>As Norm pointed out, and i think we all agreed, the large headstone in
>the shot took away from the photo.
>
>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5707294
>
>Reshot this afternoon, slightly different angle and using the 16-45 F4
>instead of the Zenitar 16mm fisheye an
Doug Franklin wrote:
>William Robb wrote:
>
>
>
>>I expect that the Interstate highways would make it the quickest,
>>but I would prefer to avoid large urban areas.
>>
>>
>
>The raw route that Google gives doesn't look too bad. I can't speak for
>the run across the Midwest, but the route it
Kenneth Waller wrote:
>Thanks Ann, it should be 5/31.
>
>Kenneth Waller
>
I know - you just WISHED it were 5/21 :)
ann
>
>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 12:37 PM
>
>---- Original Message -
>From: "ann sanfedel
Markus Maurer wrote:
>Hi Mark
>I left them an email and had an artist code one day later.
>Since nearly all of my photos are made on film and with old equipment I miss
>a lot of M/A lenses and the complete Spotmatic/Takumar series in the
>lens/camera
>selection box. I hope they will add lenses at
7;s style of separating answer from
original message :)
Thanks, Brian
I did send it to the contact us thing -- that was all I saw as a way to
send something. sigh
It has been a couple of days... but I don't have time to do any
uploading there right now anyway :)
ann
>
David Savage wrote:
>On 3/16/07, ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>David Savage wrote:
>>
>>>At 11:59 AM 15/03/2007, ann sanfedele wrote:
>>>
>>>>John -- of course when I read your subject line what passed through my
>&g
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>I think you do a decent job on the retouching. I would reduce the
>saturation a wee bit and push the middle of the RGB curve up a bit to
>brighten midrange tones without losing contrast. But the real problem
>here is that her eye is half closed. Is this a crop? I don't
graywolf wrote:
>Well, just outside of town here, my Tom Tom Navigator 5.0 software on
>the pocket pc tells me to take a sharp right in 80 yards. If I do that I
>drive into a mountain. The thing is that the road was under construction
>when the GPS van went through and there was a detour from o
Markus Maurer wrote:
>Hi Ann
>I sent them an email and got the code one day later.
>Are you pulling my leg asking if a Takumar lens is a Pentax lens?
>greetings
>Markus
>
>
>
No - I just don't remember Takumar at all I'm 70, remember :)
ann
>--
>
>I did send it to the contact us thing --
Mark Roberts wrote:
>ann sanfedele wrote:
>
>Markus Maurer wrote:
>
>
>>>Are you pulling my leg asking if a Takumar lens is a Pentax lens?
>>>
>>No - I just don't remember Takumar at all I'm 70, remember :)
>>
>>
>
Crazy -
The deer are much more interesting than the bear
OF course I remember your Mistic shot - cause I saw you shooting it :)
At least they too that one!
ann
David J Brooks wrote:
>My approved gallery shots.
>
>http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/Grandfather%20Mountain%20NPW%20200
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2468804/7#136711608-L-LB
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Shouldn't ahve been working on this stuff but I felt like it --
This was from the trip across the country in 2005 -
on my way north to visit Wheatfield
http://tinyurl.com/2bf87d
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
ng but, in fact, my memory is
declining - tho I think
not enough to be considered early alzheimers.
:)
ann
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
>ann sanfedele
>Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 11:23 PM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mai
x27;m sleepy
ann
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>Very nice, Ann. Excellent composition, beautiful sky.
>Paul
>On Mar 17, 2007, at 11:34 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
>
>
>>Shouldn't ahve been working on this stuff but I felt like it --
>>This was from the trip across the coun
William Robb wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "ann sanfedele"
>Subject: PESO: bus stop
>
>>Shouldn't ahve been working on this stuff but I felt like it --
>>This was from the trip across the country in 2005 -
>>on my way north to visit
someone, I forgot who, found the first watermarks I did on smugmug were
distracting and i agreed.
have a new one in place, as those who look at the bus stop peso will see.
mainly serves more as a signature than a serious watermark.
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdm
back up unless it
is heads up :)
ann
>
>++
>Brian Walters
>Western Sydney Australia
>
>
>
>
>Quoting ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
>>http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2468804/7#136711608-L-LB
>>
>>ann
>>
>>
>>
Bruce Dayton wrote:
>Hello ann,
>
>I looked at the Sparks, NV and bus stop. In fact, I looked at them
>all. You do have a good eye for this kind of stuff. Making the
>ordinary just a bit special and worth looking at. Sparks is my
>favorite. Glad you shared with us.
>
>
>
Thanks Bruce,
I use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In a message dated 3/17/2007 8:40:44 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2468804/7#136711608-L-LB
>
>ann
>
>==
>Outstanding gallery, ann. With some outstanding shots.
>
>(I even like the cat photos.)
>
>Ma
David Savage wrote:
>On 3/18/07, ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Well I bet she likes the second a bit better but the severe crop would
>>be as likely a reason...
>>
>>It does look "fake" after retouching - it is a bitch to do th
Juan Buhler wrote:
>On 3/14/07, ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>>http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=727
>>>
>>>
>> nice grab, Juan - but I think that little girl on the far left made you,
>>so you were only partly
I remember thinking TV's referring to his then girl friend as "Seven" on
the list and was assuming he
had named her after the Star Trek hottie - then I found out she was his
seventh "partner"/girlfriend/so
or what have you.
ann
p.s. I like that shot, Paul
Adam Maas wrote:
>Seven of Nine was
Markus Maurer wrote:
>Interesting Cotty, I prefer it with some ground but without it gives the
>illusion of an even "higher flyer".
>Thanks for the nice comments.
>
>greetings
>Markus
>
>
>
I think the crop is fine, I wish it were a bird or the moon in the sky -
but that is just because I hate
Mark Roberts wrote:
>Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
>
>
>>Not exactly shot this week but I was working on some photos and this
>>one just seemed to suit my mood best...
>>
>> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/13.htm
>>
>>Comments, critique, and flames always appreciated.
>>
>>
>
>Gre
Doug Franklin wrote:
>Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
>
>>Please read this and pass the information on to anyone you know who may
>>have pets.
>>
>>http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/03/17/petfood.recall.ap/index.html
>>
>>
>
>Boy am I glad the menagerie here will only eat Friskies and 9 Lives
>canned food.
Mark Roberts wrote:
>Bong Manayon wrote:
>
>
>
>>Elsewhere in this thread or somewhere, there's this exchange on photos
>>that were declined. Why not a PUG theme "Declined" where we post our
>>best/favorite shots that were not accepted in the Pentax Gallery :-D
>>
>>
>
>LOL! Now *that's* a
Bong Manayon wrote:
>On 3/18/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Markus Maurer wrote:
>>
>>Someone (I forget who) submitted a cat photo and had it rejected. So I
>>sent three flower shots (mainly as a joke) and they were all accepted!
>>
>>
>>
>Elsewhere in this thread or somew
John Sessoms wrote:
>Interesting, because the tiny url took me to the gallery.
>
>
>
I know - I can't figure out why that happened...
wondered if the site didn't let tinyurl link that deeply to
an individual photo -- but when I didnt tiny it , it worked.
ann, scratching head
--
PDML Pent
John Sessoms wrote:
>>From:
>>ann sanfedele
>>Markus Maurer wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I'm glad I managed to apologize one mail in advance for my erroneous
>>>assumption Ann!
>>>Age is not important here :-)
>>>greetings
&
P. J. Alling wrote:
>I think she was his 7th photo assistant. (I think the partner
>girlfriend thing came later, either that or I'd really like to see his
>job applications and job descriptions).
>
lol! I was going to say one doesn't preclude the other. :)
ann
the article is on rehab for sex offenders and yeah, there is actually a
picture of a bunch of guys sitting around
in a rehab looking place
- the photo credit is Eros Hoagland.
Now really
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
John Celio wrote:
>C'mon guys, anyone? I'd just like to know how one gets a Pentax Artist Code
>so I can join the gallery. The gallery people haven't gotten back to me
>after I used their web contact form, so I'm wondering if there's another way
>to get in touch with them.
>
>Thanks,
>John
>
John Sessoms wrote:
>>From: Bruce Dayton
>>Hello ann,
>>
>>I looked at the Sparks, NV and bus stop. In fact, I looked at them
>>all. You do have a good eye for this kind of stuff. Making the
>>ordinary just a bit special and worth looking at. Sparks is my
>>favorite. Glad you shared with us.
P. J. Alling wrote:
>And yet Oxford is still there.
>
>These are a very nice selection. I've told you I hate you, haven't I?
>
>Cotty wrote:
>
>
>>As promised, a short gallery of pics from a street celebration of one
>>thousand years of Oxford. 'Luminox' consisted of a variety of fire
>>sculptu
Cotty wrote:
>On 18/3/07, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>
>>there is only one shot that I can't figure out - (I'm sure you know
>>which one)
>>
>>My fave is the last one - the silhouette
>>
>>
>
>Thanks Ann
Cotty wrote:
>On 18/3/07, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>
>>http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/photoessays/essays/Resources/c072319.jpeg
>>
>>It looks like a bad expressionist painting behind a fence :) but please
>>tell me it isn't H
John Sessoms wrote:
>>From:
>>ann sanfedele
>>I guess this must be a guy thing - I don't understand what is
>>happening here and don't get the joke.
>>
>>
>
>Isle of Mann is a MAJOR annual motorcycle racing event, sort of like the
>Dayt
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>On Mar 17, 2007, at 8:34 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
>
>
>>Shouldn't ahve been working on this stuff but I felt like it --
>>This was from the trip across the country in 2005 -
>>on my way north to visit Wheatfield
>>
>>htt
1 - 100 of 17744 matches
Mail list logo
