>From my knowledge of how a circular polarizer works you will get a 3db
loss for every re linerazation (every polarization after the 1/4 wave
plate). Two circular polarizers (any positions)therfore would cut the
amount of light recieved in half (assuming perfect rejection of the
perpendicular pola
ndenser -- was expensive.
>
> Don
> ___
> Dr E D F Williams
> http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
> Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
> Updated: July 31, 2003
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robert Szasz" <[EMAIL
I have been utterly stumped by the folowing symptoms, if any of the three
lenses I have are fully snapped in then the camera has a good chance of
not latching onto the shutter properly and taking another frame a soon I I
release the frame advance lever. If I back the lense out 4-5 degrees the
camer
:P You're one of us light cone geeks aren't you.
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Bob Walkden wrote:
> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 07:05:21 +0100
> From: Bob Walkden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Zooms vs. primes: the final word and ultima
Does (or did) Pentax offer a camera that automaticaly stores the shot
information (fstop,speed,flash,time/date,etc.) on some sort of
retreivable media. This would be a tremendous help for post processing.
Yes and no. The copy of windows running on the virtual machine MIGHT be
open to infection (depending on firewall rules) but the OS hosting the
virtual machine would not be infected. This is one of the primary reasons
for running a virtual machine in the first place.
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Cotty wrot
6 matches
Mail list logo
