On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 21:07:37 -0500, Beaker wrote:
>something like it with a Pentax digital SLR? It looks like the pins
>on the flash will line up with contacts on the camera. Too much to
I am sure I have read somewhere that the pins don't line up, tho they are close
enough to maybe make cont
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 00:56:11 -0500, Adam Maas wrote:
>mike wilson wrote:
>>
>> I will eat Cotty's hat if any of the FGZ flashes do analogue TTL.
>>
>Start eating, the FGZ's do all three types along with Auto thyristor
>flash and manual, unlike the AF500 which only does digital and manual.
Do
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 10:12:56 +0100, Jens Bladt wrote:
If I have read my flash manual correctly (AF360FGZ) if the camera is capable of
doing PTTL. The flash will use it over TTL. IE with the IstD, only PTTL can be
used with the AF360FGZ.
James
>The two cameras may need different flashes.
>The
Just found this on Dpreview.
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1036&thread=22431507
very interesting.
not for the faint hearted or those who don't like surgery
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:05:25 -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>The little need I've had for it, it's worked fine. It's not
>particularly important to me, though: in several years of use, I've
>only had to clean the sensors in my cameras a couple of times.
>G
I turned on my dust removal every t
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:20:04 +0100, Dario Bonazza wrote:
>jim wrote:
>> I turned on my dust removal every time the camera was turned on.
>> It didn't remove any spots at all.
>> I got the Pentax sensor cleaning kit. Removed all the spots I had.
>Hi, where did you ge
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 07:12:31 +, Peter Lacus wrote:
>source and I am very interested in the whole setup (I must have missed
>the original video and as I have a 220S, if potentially might work for
>me I hope). Does it also work with vertical orientation? Also please
I too would like to know
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:25:07 +1300, David Mann wrote:
>On Jan 20, 2007, at 11:36 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
>> Absolutely bloody marvellous. I hate you.
>So do I. I haven't seen the blasted thing yet because it's always
>been cloudy around sunset.
AHH
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:18:33 +0900, David Savage wrote:
>G'day Bob,
>I'm glad you enjoyed them. I've had a lot of fun photographing it.
>I remember as a kid when Halley's comet was visible. The build up to
>it's appearance was huge. When it finally showed up I was
>disappointed, as it hadn't liv
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:30:46 +0100, Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail) wrote:
>Hello,
>Some of you may have noticed my latest GESO, about a nice conjunction
>between the thin moon crescent and the planet Venus last Saturday (GESO
>visible here):
I beleave sometime in march, there will be a lunar ecplis
Just a test. last messages haven't been going through for some reason.
maybe I have upset someone /thing :)
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
My K10D takes a long time (10-20 seconds) to come up with preview image and
saving to SD card after taking a long exposure (all above 15 seconds).
Camera was in hyper manual mode and I was guessing the exposure times.
Is this normal or is there some user error involved (ie I don't know what I is
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:26:51 +0100, Thibouille wrote:
>With long exposures, the noise reduction applied by te camera will
>slow it down quite much (same with the D) and BTW will degrade quality
>at the same time.
>Deactivate the NR when shooting long exposure is really really mandatory.
That ha
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 09:56:27 -0600, Corey Leopold wrote:
I am glad to know that other people had the same problem and that
Mr Thibault Massart could help us both.
Must send him a card next christmas
James
>Learn something new every day. This very thing was annoying me
>Friday, now I need
As subject says. anyone use this Free app?
Almost as powerfull as photoshop, in some ways, maybe more.
Interested hearing from anyone who does.
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 19:45:21 -0500, John Francis wrote:
I would like just about any one or more of those to add to my very small kit of
lenses.
James
> smc PENTAX-F 135mm F2.8 [IF]
> smc PENTAX-F* 250-600mm F5.6 ED[IF]
> smc PENTAX-F* 300mm F4.5 ED[IF]
> smc PENTAX-F* 600mm F4 ED[IF]
>
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 00:22:25 +0100, Patrick Genovese wrote:
I have found that with long exposures, the NR takes a long time to do it's
thing. almost as long as the exposure itself depending on what shutter speed
used.
So I turn NR off for long exposures
(thanks again Thibouille)
James
>Hi,
>I
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 22:33:26 +0200, Basil Vizgin wrote:
Page 72 lists what modes trailing curtian can be used in.
Just tried mine with following results.
Tv. P-TTL pre flash. Flash when shutter opens, flash when shutter closes.
TAv.as above
Av. as above
M. P-TTL pre flash. Flash w
I only thing I want to know is, will the new lenses have a driveshaft to drive
focus as well as the inbuilt motor to support all non K10D digital bodies?
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 02:19:22 -0500, P. J. Alling wrote:
>Actually it makes more sense from a cost and design perspective to drop
>the drive shaft from the lenses with built in focusing motors than
>dropping the aperture simulator from the camera body. I expect that the
>screw drive's days are
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:47:21 +1030, Peter Loveday wrote:
>Hmm... but Bill indicated that the K mount was better before they buggered
>it up... I don't think K mount has ever had the release on the other side,
>has it? At least none of my bodies do (admittedly I don't have a K series,
>only M and
Is there an external charger avilable for the k10d battries that can run from
12v DC ie car battery? would be very handy for long outback travel where the
nearest
mains outlet is several days away is one is allowed to use it.
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:07:58 -0600, William Robb wrote:
I already have a 12 to 240V inverter.
The inverter adds an extra step and uses battery power to run. not much good
when in middle of nowhere and 12v battery power is a valuable.
defeats the purpose of what I want to do.
jim
e tasty drinks cold ;)
jim
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:10:53 -0800, Bruce Dayton wrote:
>I already tried it with both studio lights and the AF400T. With a
>hotshoe PC adapter, they both trigger just fine. I also hooked up the
>AF400T to the Adapter that goes into the hotshoe and plugs into the
>flash. I set the flash to TTL a
has anyone tried panning with SR turned on with K100D or K10D?
The results would be interesting to see.
James
(Still waiting for my K10D)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
hmmm Maybe an auto panning detect in next firmware upgrade? :)
jim
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:16:29 -0500, P. J. Alling wrote:
>John Whittingham wrote:
>>> "Does the SR system work during pan shots of moving subjects?
>>> Yes, it does work, but switching the SR function
I have above lens 3.5-5.6. No idea how old it is, bought 2nd hand from KEH.
Have used it on my MZ7 since I bought it. today, have tried it on a new K100D
and camera thought it was a K mount lens despite it being a fully auto lens.
Also tried it on 2 MZ60's, same result ie camera won't work with it
I write this in the year 2007. see ya here in 24 hours :)
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:35:51 +, mike wilson wrote:
>Doug Franklin wrote:
>> ann sanfedele wrote:
>>
>>>until it is totally blacked out
>>
>>
>> I've heard people say this repeatedly about shooting through
>> polarization, but I've never seen "totally blacked out" due to
>> polarizing fi
Check out this lens.
Wounder what the pics would be like?
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Raytex-PL42-Pinhole-optic-lens-for-Pentax-screw-
mount_W0QQitemZ220067263758QQihZ012QQcategoryZ44751QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
mmm 2 liner, copy and paste twice :)
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:06:00 +0100, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
>Yes, it is possible if imaging processor allows this. In firmware v
>0.2 it was possible to set iso50 and 3200. I believe for some reasons
>Pentax has cut these sensitivities in firmware v 1.0
I thought i read in an interview (link
Finally got My K10D today YAH
but my Sigma 24-70 zoom won't work with it. Won't auto focus, won't auto
anything,
Yet same lens works perfictaly on my MZ7.
I ordered a Body only cause I had 2 lens's i wanted to use with it, which is i
guess why it took so long to get the camera in
At my work, they bought a digital camera around 2000, a 3 Mp point and shoot
thing but it was an up market one with hot shoe flash.
Cannot remember the brand now.
it uses i think a CF card or something like it, not little pins.
It cannot be used any more because of the repeated times the card has
>SIGnificant MAlfunction strikes again.
LOL.
mmm how do sigma lens work on sigma camera? any compatiability issuses there?
maybe they reverse engineer there own lens :P
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>Buy Pentax lenses. They're better performers, 99.9% of the time
>anyway. The Pentax FA24-90/3.5-4.5 AL would be an excellent choice
>for a lens in this focal length range.
Thanks.
tho with digital, I will also need a very wide lens to cover from 10/15 to 24/28
James
--
PDML Pentax-Disc
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:31:01 -0600, William Robb wrote:
>The second biggest problem we had was Sony Memory Sticks.
Why is that? I am totally ignorant of how they work/connect etc.
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:35:10 -0500, Adam Maas wrote:
>Potentially, since their lens protocol is a fairly blatant copy of the
>EOS protocol. IIRC they originally tried to licence EF mount. got turned
>down and decided to use a K-mount derived Bayonet on a mount that's
>otherwise EOS. Sigma-moun
I fired off an email to sigma with my special email gun and actually got a
response.
Discovered the lens I have is an older model and they don't have bits to update
it.
looks like a MZ7 with a sigma zoom will be up for sale soon.
My K10D like some others have discovered, has a very weird shutter
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:34:38 -0600, Charles Robinson wrote:
>Did anyone else manage to finally see this elusive thing?
If it wasn't for that [EMAIL PROTECTED]& cloud in the evening
sky
Funny tho, It always seems to happen in summer.
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:51:56 -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Under lens ID part, it has correctly picked up both a 80-320 zoom and a tamron
28-300 zoom.
I have tried an A lens and all it said was a series lens.
Would there be a an entry at all for the focal length entered?
The camera can get the m
Just tried a Sigma 28-90 3.5-5.6 AF zoom (macro) and show tags reported the
following.
DNG Data: Lens Identification63 1 2 @0x032C 3 44
Maybe a small adjustment is in order unless other lens report the same ID.
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.ne
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:18:01 -0500, John Francis wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 07:28:36PM +1000, jim wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:51:56 -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>>
>> Under lens ID part, it has correctly picked up both a 80-320 zoom and a
>> tamron 28-300
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:36:01 -0500, Charles Robinson wrote:
Not a pin as such no. Camera comnunication with lens is some form of serial
protocol.
The DIGITAL pin I believe is power for the lens chip. The r3, r2 and r1
contacts are for the serial bus of some form.
A1 and A2 aren't used tho these
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:05:54 +0100, John Whittingham wrote:
I beleave it should act as an A series lens depending on how the electronics
are set up in the lens.
ie the electronics with out power short or leave open the contacts for min and
max apature.
only way to find out is to try it out. One
lens and a logic probe says that there is
some form of comnunication
happening. I have told Boz but without some facts/ logic traces to back it up,
I cannot prove it.
Also the lens info contacts can be made to do both input and ourput.
James
>Jim, look at Boz's site. The Pentax contac
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:11:17 +0100, John Whittingham wrote:
>work like an 'A' series lens. If it ever stops raining over here in sunny
>England I'll go out and give it a try.
RAIN!!??? send some over here to sunny Queensland here in Australia. We are
about to go to level 7 water restrictions...
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:48:16 -0400, Adam Maas wrote:
Adam
Your MZ60 is different to the 2 I have here. Both the ones I have Won't work
with A series lenses at all.
The instruction manual doesn't even list A series lenses as being compatiable
with this camera
Also. have a close look at the pi
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:56:55 +0200, syb vis wrote:
>What does level 7 mean?
no watering the garden at all. no topping up the pool.
limated to x amount of liters a day. current level 6 is 140 a day.
Level 7 will be much less.
We haven't had good rain to fill our main dam for over 5 years..
James
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:13:52 +0200, Thibouille wrote:
You are confusing the power contacts near the focus drive shaft with ones I am
talking about.
Please look at the picture of the MZ60 on Boz's site and count the contacts
near the lens release button.
You will quickly see that 2 are missing a
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:25:53 -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
>Gotta getta well!
we are not allowed to dig one.
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:58:22 +1000, Digital Image Studio wrote:
Very interesting.
As I don't have an F series lens, could you possiabily tell me what covering
the "digital" contact
does for one of that type of lens.
Interested to know the affect for FAJ, DFA, DA and DA* lenses as well
>What I
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:28:36 +0200, syb vis wrote:
Ground is very dry. dam is at about 17% capacity. here are some at this site:
http://james.bsch.au.com/gallery/080407
doesn't really show a great deal, just an idea.
James
>That sounds really bad. How dry is the ground? Agriculture must suffer
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:27:12 -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
In this time of drought, we cannot dig wells or even pump out of a well if we
had one.
Something about the underground water reserves and preserving them.
We haven't had any good rain for at least 6 years.
Any holes we dig in the yard, the g
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 15:06:24 -0700, Juan Buhler wrote:
I have a A35-70 3.5- 4.5 zoom and it has correct aperture values in camera.
Is the best I can do, sorry.
James
>When I mount my A35-70/4 zoom on the K10D I get some strange
>aperture-related behavior. The indicated apertures (lens in A, bod
This is where my Mig Welder comes in handy. several spots and touching up with
a grinder will permeantally fix the adaptor to the screw mount lens.
;)
James
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 23:57:27 -0400, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>Could somebody refresh my memory? I
>want to permanently adapt a M42
>lens
I currently have loan of a Nikon super coolscan 5000 ED. It works very well.
adaptors are avilable for it to scan roles of neg or posative.
this one only has the neg scanner (up to 6) and mounted slide atatchments.
Software includes auto scratch remover if you want to use it.
Ability to scan with
I currently have loan of a Nikon super coolscan 5000 ED. It works very well.
adaptors are avilable for it to scan roles of neg or posative.
this one only has the neg scanner (up to 6) and mounted slide atatchments.
Software includes auto scratch remover if you want to use it.
Ability to scan with
Thanks to a court rulling here in australia. All dvd players must be able to
play DVD's from other reagons.
Sometimes the player comes unlocked, others come with an added sheet of paper
on how to unlock the region codeing.
Depending on the Player, the hidden menu that has the reagon unlock also h
Ahh yes. you did my trick, tho I also bent the little spring so the ball
wouldn't go back in properly.
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:41:26 +0200, Vic Mortelmans wrote:
>First, to my own fault, I lost the little ball (what did you expect?).
>Actually, I still have it, but it dropped into the inside of
I heard from a Nikon guy that one lens nikon made had to be recalled because it
wouldn't focus properly. yet camera said it was focused.
Don't want pentax to have a bungle like that.
James
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:08:02 -0700 (PDT), Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
>Ned talks about Quality Assu
Picked up A shintaro brand SD card 2GB Extreme speed for $55 AU . Had 150X on
the packet.
Anybody heard or used one of these?
I have tried continous shooting on my K10D saveing RAW PEF. fired off about 10
shots before slowing down.
is this consistant with extreme III cards from sandisk?
james
This has been asked before so please flame me privatly if you wish.
What files does one need to view PEF files as thumbnails in win explorer?
My wifes computer has installed the raw viewer from mickysoft but it isn't
working.
Help needed please.
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pd
What does every one here have there image tone and contrast setting on?
I ask this because i ran into a guy the other day with a K10D and a 360FGZ
flash.
He asked me If my K10D over exposes and have I heard about it.
He stated that he got from somewhere, to set image tone to bright and to set
Co
I have 2 flashes, a AF360FGZ and a AF280T which I intended to use for macro
work with my SMC Takumar macro 100 plus an extention tube on my K10D.
I made up a flash Bracket at work and used the pentax 5P cables to connect
everything together.
Set both flashes to manual full power only to discover
contrast settings are irrelevant.
>Paul
>On May 27, 2007, at 5:41 AM, jim wrote:
>> What does every one here have there image tone and contrast setting
>> on?
>>
>> I ask this because i ran into a guy the other day with a K10D and a
>> 360FGZ flash.
>> He
On Tue, 29 May 2007 06:33:32 +1000, Leon Altoff wrote:
>Hi James,
>I'm not sure what is causing the problem, but the quick and easy fix is
Is something to do with the camera attached. tried with both flashes connected
without the camera and shorted the centre contact to ground.
both flashes fi
All great. He was quite good in a western too, 'The Gunfighter' (?)
- Original Message -
From: "Ann Sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: Way OT: Gregory Peck passed on
> Jim
a lot of my messages aren't getting through..
james
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:58:06 +1000, jim wrote:
>a lot of my messages aren't getting through..
>james
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:28:18 +, Cotty wrote:
>1/ How many DSLRs do you currently own?
1. total in this house is 3
>2/ How many have you owned in the past?
>3/ How many years ago did you buy (not just use) your first DSLR?
less then a year.
>4/ What's the longest length o
MZ7 with batery grip.
super program with motor drive, both getting repaired at this moment.
Camera,s I used to have.
Spotmatic, sold it when I got my me super
ME super till it was stolen :( insurance got me the super program.
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.ne
hmmm. it appears that they have changed the artical.
wounder why?
James
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:50:03 +0100, AlunFoto wrote:
>Patrick Genovese wrote:
>> See here: http://www.aronsen.no/default.asp?ArtID=428
>Um... Did they change the article? There's no mention of any SLR on
>that page. Only c
Interesting catalogs.
I see the K200D has weather seals judging by the diagram and a grip.
On the 20D catalog, What are those big white lenses??? nothing in on the
list
Also, the pentax A series teleconverters are still avilable as well as the 1.7
auto focus adaptor
James
--
PDML
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:47:34 -0600, Corey Leopold wrote:
You currently have northern hemisphere lenses. You will need to sell them and
buy southern hemisphere ones.
The difference is due to the magnetic fields affect on the light rays coming
into the lens.
All lens elements are ground different
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:54:01 -0500, John Francis wrote:
I forgot about that one.
Thanks John.
James
>Don't forget to replace all your circular polarizers with ones
>that have the opposite twist, too ..
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_
nice pics.
The most important thing i want to know. did you do the geocache while you were
at the south pole??
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
There was a discussion a while ago about flash trigger voltages and a list
somewhere on the net of what they are.
I have come across a very interesting article in a local electronics mag about
this very subject.
What they have discovered is, it is very difficult to get an accurate
measurement of
On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 22:15:37 +1000, jim wrote:
The magazine is called silicon chip and it does have a web site. unfortunatily
due to copyright I cannot directly copy the mag artical.
The mag has only just come out and it is an australian mag so don't forget to
add the .au. unfortunatily
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:45:24 +0200, Thibouille wrote:
The magazine is called silicon chip and it does have a web site. unfortunatily
due to copyright I cannot directly copy the mag artical.
The mag has only just come out and it is an australian mag so don't forget to
add the .au. unfortunatily
How backward compatiable are the F, FA DFA lenses with the Super A/Program?
I have only an FA 80-320 zoom and it doesn't provide the correct apature
information to the camera for program mode or shutter priority.
Have tried my DA* and it is the same.
Have a few sigma's and a tamron and they don't
have a manual sent to you on CD ROM. If any of you
have an older Pentax and would like a manual for it, you might find it
here. Here is the link...
http://www.manualsrus.com/Shopping_Cart/pentax.asp
Jim
nual for it, you might find it here. Here is
> >the link...
>
><http://www.manualsrus.com/Shopping_Cart/pentax.asp>http://www.manualsrus.c
om/Shopping_Cart/pentax.asp
> >
> >Jim
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
>
way...good luck.
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Treena Harp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 10:45 PM
Subject: New old K1000
> It seems my husband is now the proud owner of a very good condition K1000
we
> picked up at one of the l
MY TURN! Tiny Girl, aka Tiny Tones, Tiny Tunes, Tiny Twerp, etc...Shot on a
Super Program with SMPC A 50mm/1.7 and Sunpak dedicated flash on Imation
film.
http://members.spree.com/entertainment/jimmoniz/TinyTones.jpg
- Original Message -
From: Todd Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL P
Hewwo
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Alan W Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 5:07 PM
Subject: Saying Hello!
> I;m new to the list. Just turned 60 and a Pentax owner for over half my
> life. The old Spotmatic still
I love Ollie. What beautiful eyes! The one of Kiska is great too. I'd
love to catch Tiny or Kitty in a pose like that!
Jim
- Original Message -
From: tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: More cat pictures
A good place to look for used gear prices if you haven't yet is
http://www.keh.com, or you can also try http://www.kcamera.com. Good luck!
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Bart Pfeffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2001 12:01 PM
S
Hey Steve! I used to live near Redondo Beach! (Torrance, San Pedro) Anyway,
I live near Seattle now, and they have a couple of international newsstands!
I'll try to get a copy. Congratulations Frank!
- Original Message -
From: Steve Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent
I'm all ears (in a manner of speaking).
Jim
Thanks everyone! I will let you know how things turn out...Jim
- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: I need film advice...
> Tri-X should
ry much as well.
Mr. Mann, you wuz ROBBED!
Jim
- Original Message -
From: David A. Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 1:04 AM
Subject: No prizes for second place!
> Hi all,
>
> My local camera shop runs an informal monthl
That's the same price they're asking at Adorama...but they don't have them
yet, either...
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Mark Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pentax-Discuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 11:56 AM
Subject: Low Cameraworld.com
Thank you for your contributions, I have learned a lot.
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pentax List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 10:30 PM
Subject: It's Time To Go
> I'll be leaving the list for an indefi
Aw, dang! The auction ended, and not one single bid was made! Keppler
would have killed for that bargain!
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Gary L. Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pentax Users Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 5:45 PM
Subject: Spotted on
Obviously focus-free cameras are in high demand among
"perfessionals"...wonder what magazine the seller subscribed to to attain
this modern marvel? Or how many box tops he or she collected? Or where the
time-share condo is?
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Gary L. Murphy <[EM
While I'm not 100% sure, I believe that was Ringo's own camera. I've seen
other pictures of him toting a Pentax. On a side note, one of Linda
McCartneys cameras was a Pentax as well.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 10:31
ttp://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1244326755
That'll be 5 bucks... :^)
Jim
- Original Message -
From: James Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 8:38 PM
Subject: Motor Drive for Ricoh KR-10
> Can anyone tell me abo
Why Sid, you handsome (melancholy) devil! :) Great shots and a good
beginning for your website. I'll be cranking out a site soon too, I hope...
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Sid Barras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 11:43 PM
Sub
Try this one if you haven't...though you probably have...
http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/pentaxlx/
Jim
- Original Message -
From: William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pentax Discuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 10:33 PM
Su
1 - 100 of 1283 matches
Mail list logo
