Bizzare. Am I allowed to say I like the odd ones? (-:
Cheers,
David
Herb Chong wrote:
i was shooting yesterday in the Catskills and needed an in-between ND
filter of 4 stops because i only had my 6-stop B+W filter with me and
not my 3-stop one. since i carry a Hi-Tech 85mm square ND filter wit
G'day Pee Dee em ellers,
Went out today for a quick shoot hoping to catch something that I saw a
couple of years ago and would have made a great photo op. My other
motive was that I'm in denial about the cold months coming on. People
posting 'spring' images only reminds me that our season's end
David Savage wrote:
The shot of the flowers could do with having the levels & contrast
tweaked a bit.
Yeah I can see what you mean, it's pretty subdued.
Nice stuff
Cheers!
David
>>http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/flannel.jpg
>>http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/coppertail.jpg
frank theriault wrote:
Like 'em both.
Thanks cobber!
I rather like the muted, subdued
colours. Those colours, along with the lovely OOF stuff, give the
photo a rather ethereal, misty (without being soft) l
Yeah, well, what does Savage know anyway?
Heh, I wasn't going to be so explicit (-:
Congrats Mark!
Mark Cassino wrote:
> But I'm really blown away by being in proximity to
E.O. Wilson,
Yeah that's the really great bit! Might have to pick your brains about
how you go about your work at some stage as it's the sort of thing I
might try some day.
Cheers,
David
Beautiful! The jet trail is a bit annoying but the photo is very strong
even with it. That golden reflection off the paving!
Cheers,
David
John Forbes wrote:
I like to build up a bit of anticipation before releasing the URL. :-)
http://www.johnpforbes.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/thames/_IGP0582.jpg
Joh
Charming image Dave!
My only criticism is that I'd love the image to be larger!
Cheers,
David
David Mann wrote:
Hi all,
Now that I've done my new PAW site I might as well add something to it.
I'm pretty sure I've shown this one before but not as a PAW. I have
some new slides to scan but I don't h
G'day Derby,
Nice shots, these guys really do like modelling (-:
In case you were wondering, it's a nymph of the Snake Mantid, Kongobatha
diademata. Sometimes used to see these guys flying down corridors and
clinging to windows at school (-:
Cheers,
David
Derby Chang wrote:
It's a pretty day tod
Yeah, that's the problem of course. Many of the question simply can't
be properly answered with a yes/no or agree/disagree choice.
Agreed. But I got a 0% tension so my conclusion was that the test is
quite awesome.
Cheers,
David
aziness (-:)
Cheers,
David
P. J. Alling wrote:
You have so little stress you're in a coma, or maybe just asleep.
David Nelson wrote:
Yeah, that's the problem of course. Many of the question simply can't
be properly answered with a yes/no or agree/disagree choice.
Agreed. But I got a 0
Fred Widall wrote:
Canadian goose
(In the spirit of the tiny tumbling pebble that precedes the avalanche...)
"uh oh..."
I did something similar recently - though my problem was I couldn't find
a subject. Check it out:
.
Cheers,
David
Cotty wrote:
Had this is idea for a nice pic, and then apathy set it and it all went
down the pan. So I present for you
Thought Of Making A Picture But Then Couldn't B Arsed
Found this an interesting read:
http://www.pinhole.cz/en/pinholecameras/dirkon_01.html
Spotted on the dpreview forums where there is talk of a digital version
expected in 2006.
Cheers,
David
Were you using the batteries in the battery grip by any chance? I've now
given up using batteries in the grip as I suspect there's a contact
problem somewhere along the line that leads to erratic battery performance.
Alternatively, do you trust your charger? I've had trouble there in the
past
"THIS is a bad dog: he was gnawing on a human corpse when I startled him."
http://www.michaelyon-online.com/wp/the-long-road-ahead.htm
Cheers,
David
Joseph Tainter wrote:
I meant to send this to the list. Mind not working this morning.
Joe
Original Message
Subject: Re: Fw:
This thread is just shocking; and it started out with so much potential...
> I think you'll meet with alot of resistance,
> but then again you might get a charge out of it.
Either that or get charged with battery.
David
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Peter J. Alling" Su
LOL good stuff JC (-:
The three random lenses on my desk in front of me:
A* 300mm f/4outtie
Tamron adaptall 2 28mm f2.5 outtie
tamron 90mm f/2.5 macro outtie
David
Jim Colwell wrote:
Does your lens have a belly button ?
If it has a diaphragm, then the answer is ye
I think that rob's point is that while focal length is nearly the
same, AOV isn't, and hence a comparison of AOV is more pertinant to
the discussion of APS vs FF. Comparing the DA 14mm with the FA 20mm
shows nicely how the APS lens isn't a saving in size and weight (or
cost!) for an equivalent AOV.
> Anybody know why a 14mm DA lens with 90 degrees
> coverage would be bigger, slower, and costlier to make than the 20
> mm lens with 94 degress coverage ASSUMING identical image
> quality?
The heritage of 35mm - as I just said, I suspect it's distance to film
plane. Don't know enough about it for
Only the recently announced (not yet available) DA 40mm f/2.8 Limited
(Pancake lens).
David
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
your answer doesn't meet the terms of the question.
Are there any other PENTAX DA prime lenses besides the
14mm?
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Alan Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
They come up at that price fairly regularly Mishka if I'm not mistaken.
I think I've even seen an engraved one that was a bit cheaper. That and
a 75/2.8 could come to just a bit over $300 which is sorely tempting.
There are quite a few kits going on ebay and photo.net and the like
which are gen
And mine:
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/chilis.jpg
David
Fred Widall wrote:
Fred's red with embarrassment at missing this month's PUG.
So here's what I would have submitted if I'd got around to it.
Fred's Red. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2838444
WARNING - Sexual content. Image show
Same guy - interesting stuff.
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=48558&item=3849950274&rd=1
David
Don Sanderson wrote:
This kinda falls into the unique and unusual category so I don't think I'm
breaking the eekBay rule.
A 42mm f/0.75 K-Mount!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.
Nice feel to the shot David! I like it.
Thanks Ryan - I spend thousands on a digital camera system so that I can
take grainy B&W with what looks like false colour (-:
BTW - loved everyone's PUG entrys (including the late ones)
Some faves:
" Rhymes With Fled... " by Max McRae (novel, great effec
Just shot today - haven't done a lot lately.
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/red.jpg
Comments much appreciated as always.
Cheers,
David
Good to see you're still laughing (-:
Alan Chan wrote:
Am I luck or what? LOL!!!
http://www3.telus.net/wlachan/fa77.jpg
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
"Production is to be limited not by the number of units built but by the
high demands of production process and quality control."
Quality control!
(-:
David
Caveman wrote:
From Pentax US web site:
"PENTAX remains dedicated to creating innovative products into the 21st
century.&q
That Leica looks okay to me, but...
frank theriault hesitated:
Wait, didn't he have a blue one, or am I
thinking of someone else's?
Sounds like Alan Chan's 'Am I Insane?' Super Program.
http://www.pbase.com/image/27573890
http://www.pbase.com/image/27573887
That's one of the coolest looking camer
Yeah I was just thinking that... sort of thing where you'd have to think
hard about what to wear when you went out shooting with it (maybe dust
off the old pimp-outfit) (-:
Or put it in a glass cabinet.
David
frank theriault opined:
Cool, but only in the hands of
others, IMHO. I wouldn't be cau
Welcome back Shaun, good to hear everything's going well. How old's the
little tyke now?
Checked out your site briefly - looked very good!
Cheers,
David
Dr. Shaun Canning wrote:
Hi Gang,
After a hiatus of about 2 months, I'm back! A lot has happened since
unsubbing last. Our little boy became qu
An example of fill flash I used today with a rather pretty model in some
bright sunlight:
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/fill.jpg
My technique, for anyone who's interested, was to set the shutter at
1/150 (I was using a non-a lens), then adjust the aperture (using the
DOF preview + meter method
A used FA* 85mm f/1.4 just went on eBay for $810 USD. They are available
from B&H for $799 and come with a soft case too (-:
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=3850483312
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=40803&is=REG
Oh - and
"I am a lumberjack and I am ok"...
I sleep all night and I work all day...
COME ON EVERYONE...
I cut down trees, I wear high heels...
I've taken quite a few shots of this subject, and this photo has been
sitting in photoshop for a day and a half while I've debated whether or
not to post it, but now I've looked at it too many times and have no
idea of its merits. It's just annoying to me that I can't make a
stunning image from
I ate the virgin mary grilled cheese sandwich. It was sacrelicious.
David
Illinois Bill wrote:
I had heard that eBay had removed the auction prior to it's completion
because it failed to meet the rules.
IL Bill
On Nov 17, 2004, at 8:50 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:
Follow up to this thread from several
Seem to be appearing in Japan. A bit of googling and pondering the
meaning of multiple question marks (translators are for wimps!) has
revealed a couple of piccies you might be interested in.
http://too.cheap.jp/blog/archives/2004-10/30_0018.php
http://insomnia.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2004/10/d_f
Thanks everyone for the constructive comments; I'm just waiting for the
peeling to spread down the trunk a bit more so that I can shoot a bit
more taking your advice. Comments below...
Bruce Dayton critiqued:
> peeled bark near the top and out into the green
> is soft and my eye is drawn to it.
Sam Jost reported:
the *istD just 'feels' better in hand, even the proud D70
owner said so.
I held the D70 and had a play for a little while... In my hands it felt
better than the *istD (deeper grippy bit), but not on par with the *ist
D with grip attached.
The viewfinder seemed not too bad to
*drools all over keyboard*
q-:
mike wilson wrote:
I can't believe nobody went for this.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=3852615056&ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:IT
A stunning bargain.
mike
G'day,
Looks like I'll be cracking this lens (Kiron 105mm f/2.8 macro) open in
the near future to remove a load of rubbish from just in front of the
diaphragm. Got it off eBay recently and was very annoyed to find this
muck, but otherwise it's in pretty good nick and am keen to see the
results
Heh!
If anyone had a lens diagram
that'd be awesome too.
Scratch that - just found a "Rolleinar HFT 1:2,8/105mm Macro" that's
manufactured by Kiron, looks pretty much identical and weighs the same
as mine.
http://www.rolleiclub.com/rollei/sl35/lenses/images/rolleinar/rolleinar_105%20mm2-8_kiron
I certainly like your version better (-:
Cheers,
David
Paul Stenquist wrote:
So I'm walking in Chicago, and I see a Lucky Jeans billboard. Just so
happens I recently shot a woman for stock pulling on a pair of Lucky
Jeans. So I think, "I ought to shoot this billboard and replace their
shot with
might deaden them in some samples.
I'm afraid that an addiction to tampering and fiddling might have just
begun... :-D
Cheers,
David
David Nelson wrote:
G'day,
Looks like I'll be cracking this lens (Kiron 105mm f/2.8 macro) open in
the near future to remove a load of rubbish from
Good stuff mate! Looking forward to seeing what this camera can do.
Had a play with one a couple of days ago in a camera shop (disappointed
that they only had a crappy sigma zoom on it) and much prefer the deeper
grip... the function button controls are very intuitive and you can be
pretty quick
What gives, does EC not affect TTL flash in manual?
Exactly my experience... however I've found that it's generally pretty
accurate. It's just those few situations where it refuses to cooperate!
What does one do in this situation?
If you're using the inbuilt flash... cover part of it up or simila
http://picasaweb.google.com/hundrednaire/Pentax?authkey=Y2exq8ebUEWpMysKHGP2s6cVHOs
Post on the topic:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1036&thread=19877019
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Anemone.
ah neh meh nee.
Sorry, pet hate.
Nice colours, not sure about the big shadowy bit in the centre (which is
where is eye is drawn too). I need something there to look at but can't
find it.
Cheers,
David
David Mann wrote:
> Another flower pic with too little DOF ;)
>
> http://www.blu
David Savage wrote:
> Isn't it "Arr" as in "Arr me hearty"
Actually, there's Arr, Yarr and Harr, all with subtly different meanings
that wouldn't be evident to a landlubber.
(-:
David
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/news/2006/press-image/200646-05.jpg
*swoons*
Purrrty, bit rich for my blood though I expect.
Plus there's this about the 645D if anyone's interested:
"This product will be continuously upgraded by incorporating newly
developed image sensors, with its final effec
Looks like Samsung is having their own rebranded K10D
Samsung Camera Adds Step-Up Model to Growing DSLR Range with Launch of GX-10
http://www.thephotostation.net/modules.php?name=News&file=showarticle&threadid=25628
http://notifier.svmedia.com/pub/rjgr01-001/Email_Images/back3%20LR.jpg
http://not
Wow. Pentax are really building a lineup with something for everyone I'd
say.
Wonder what the new DA and D FA primes will be like? Personally I'd hope
we're talking nice optics with... consumer build? for a low price.
Cheers,
David
Joseph Tainter wrote:
> http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/ja/le
Hey, you're addressing a uni student you know (-:
You want good build, buy limited and FA* lenses q-:
I'll take the cheaper, lighter, smaller option.
Cheers,
David
David Savage wrote:
> At 12:46 PM 21/09/2006, David Nelson wrote:
>> Wow. Pentax are really building a li
G'day,
You may remember my problem with my *ist D, where the pop-up flash
seemed to seize the camera's operations. After more of a fiddle I reckon
that the problem probably indeed resides in the flash, or whatever
mechanism charges and gives flash information to the main body. I never
got th
Excellent stuff! Check out true story 3!
http://www.juergenspecht.com/truestories/newyearscards2003/
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Freakin' heck, Robert, where did you find this guy?!?! I could spend all
day on this bloody site...
Check THIS out!! Very clever and freakin' hilarious...
http://w
Had a great time and am pleased to say I got off fairly lightly with
that enormous fish - didn't take too much out of my 'saving for 200mm
macro' piggy bank.
Very impressed with the limited lenses that were present, as well as
with Stan's grip (even though he was bagging it out all night). More
Just had to share my latest lot of birdie pics in this thread - had a
visit a couple of weeks ago from a really majestic bird - called the
Pacific Baza or Crested Hawk. Popped out with my camera and monopod and
got some shots.
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/baza.jpg
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.ne
th ago, and am now learning to
identify birds by myself.)
My method is:
1. take photos or notes
2. Find someone who can tell me what it is OR if this fails
3. Resort to bird book.
Actually, I tell a lie, I did know what this particular bird was (-:
David
Herb...
- Original Message -
very well captured, though!
cheers,
frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: David Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW - birds and
Whoops - didn't answer this in the end!
It was from my garden (-:
David
Chris wrote:
Hi David,There you go again,beautiful!Where did you take the pic?
Regards Chris K
decision
to use one. You obviously use yours well.
cheers,
frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: David Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
This is a piccy I took a few months ago when I was still learning the
ins and outs of the *ist D (and, for that matter, SLR photography on the
whole!).
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/citropa.jpg
I'm a frogger BTW - I find that stomping around in swamps in the dark
and wet, looking for my amphibi
99! I had 69 in my head.
What was his number?
Agent 86 (-:
You just missed one guys:
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3807094041&category=15240
Funny, it's labelled as a Telescope converter rather than Monocular
converter (if indeed it is the same thing?).
David
Herb Chong wrote:
i'm looking for one too, but i have little hope of s
Ah... checking for pentax news at 6:30 in the morning before uni...
http://pentaxusa.com/news/news_display.cfm?pressid=190
"PENTAX Imaging Company has announced a second lens designed for the
*ist D digital SLR will ship later this month. The smc PENTAX-DA 14mm
F2.8 ED [IF] interchangeable wid
Amita Guha wrote:
I'm trying to use my 400mm mirrored Sigma with it.
Does this lens even have an aperture? Excuse me if it does, it's just
that IME mirror lenses don't. If it does, and isn't an A lens, then
aperture is controlled via the lens, not the body.
Nice shot Christian! Can't complain about anything!
REply to comment from frank below:
I wonder what the purpose/function is of
the dark pupil-looking thing is in the centre?
It doesn't actually exist. The number of times I've had to answer this
question since taking insect photos... (-:
Yep, it'
G'day,
Another recent photo I've taken in the garden. I'm lucky enough to have
a few sugar gliders in the area, and often get a couple feeding on an
acacia tree in my back yard. I was more-or-less testing to see how I'd
go with flash and my tamron 500/8 mirror at night. But first, the URL (-:
ht
ng
Cultural Heritage Services
Lawrence Way, Karratha,
Western Australia,
6714
0414-967644
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.heritageservices.com.au
-Original Message-
From: David Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 4:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW - Sugar Gl
G'day,
How many of you managed to get Infrared photography with your digital gear?
I did some tries, and at last I've got at least one interesting photography
(to my eyes, at least):
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2373773
Very nice pic! I love the surreal walkway/grass effect! I can
A couple of possibles (dunno about these dealers) found through Froogle
(froogle.google.com):
$799 USD:
http://www.tristatecamera.com/lookat.php3?sid=oj4rpwvg&sku=PENDA1428&cs=store.php3&store=3&levels=00290276&st=0
$799 Canadian: http://www.mcbaincamera.com/digital/digitalpen.htm
Time shall te
I picked up an old, brassed and dusty tamron adaptall 28mm f/2.5 for
next to nothing (the mount that I got with it is probably worth more
than what I paid for it and lens). It's quite good, even wide open (some
CA that I've noticed) and improves significantly stopped down a bit. I
like it - cer
Got to witness something that I always think of as quite special - a
mantid ovipositing (that means laying eggs... and an ootheca is an egg-case)
Like many insects, these things generally exist in the winter only in
the form of eggs tucked away somewhere safe - at this time of year (it's
autumn
that even if she was disturbed the ootheca
should be fine.
You're not the David Nelson from Unreal Pictures by any chance?
Nope!
David
Love, Light and Peace,
- Peter Loveday
Director of Development, eyeon Software
- Original Message -
From: "David Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTE
G'day,
If anyone remembers me and is interested in what I've been doing for a
little while, photography-wise and to some extent writing-wise, have a
look at my photoblog:
http://davidavid.blogspot.com
Cheers,
David
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinf
G'day fellow Pentaxians,
Here's a photo I took just then for my first PAW - it's a beetle with
some pretty spectacular pectinate antennae (possibly a
/Peisarthrius /species).
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/beetle.jpg
Taken with an old tamron 90mm (52B) and 2x TC, ISO 200, f/9.5, 1/125,
inbuilt f
Pentax *ist D with FA-J 18-35mm (-:
Well, okay I kinda tell a lie.
My dad was a pentax user - originally with a spotty, 50/1.4, 28/3.5 and
some tele-zoom. Then when that got stolen (containing baby photos of
me!) he got a K1000 and A 50/2 which I used once or twice, never
seriously though.
C
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
Tamron does a 180 Macro.
It's supposedly very good, but it's not made in Pentax mount alas.
Sigma's new 150mm macro is also supposedly very good but this isn't made
in Pentax mount either. I belive there are some sigma 180mm macros as
well, these are available in
Pål Jensen wrote:
another between 70 and 80.
Between 60 and 70 in fact.
Cheers,
David
I'm not crazy about the idea of IS, in body or lens based. Sure, it
would be useful for some situations, but it has its limitations from my
point of view. What I would *much* rather be able to do is push shutter
speed up by having better performance at high ISO. The advantages of
this over an e
From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Has KonicaMinolta released any "digital-only" lenses, or is their
lineup strictly 35mm still?
Herb Chong wrote:
> three yesterday.
From the KM press release:
"2. Effective Anti-Shake compensation equivalent to a shutter speed 2 -
3 stops slower*1 with Dynax
I'm surprised no-one has commented on this already - to me the eyes of
the young guy look artificial. Like the whites and blacks have been
enhanced or something. His right eye (i.e. the one on the left) in
particular looks quite horrible to me.
Are my suspicions at all correct or am I imaginin
Pretty cool Rob, and thanks for the link to autostitch, I've been
playing with that since you started posting your panos.
This one doesn't seem as crisp as what I've come to expect from you.
Maybe better to make the output pano larger originally in AutoStitch
then resize it in photoshop?
Any
Cool images Derby, that bright sky is freaky in some of the shots! The
bridge looks very 'sci-fi' from below like that.
Re: the scratch, we've all been told what a small effect a front element
scratch has on optics, but I agree, it's still always a bummer. Serves
you right for having such a ri
After all this talk of unappetising food, here's a photo of the lunch I
ate yesterday. I made it, thought it looked pretty good, so took a snap
of it. Bon appétit.
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/pizza.jpg
*ist D, FA50 macro, 1/90 f/2.8, ISO 800
Comments appreciated.
Cheers,
David
m, I sure do like good pizza.
Shel
"You meet the nicest people with a Pentax"
[Original Message]
From: David Nelson
After all this talk of unappetising food, here's a photo of the lunch I
ate yesterday. I made it, thought it looked pretty good, so took a snap
of it. Bon a
I'm curious to know if anybody likes this shot.
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/jumping.jpg
*ist D, ISO 800, FA50 macro @ f/4, 1/125, monopod.
Cheers,
David
f thing in
the absence of alternatives (i.e. when I don't have or am not inclined
to set up my flash or tripod.
The suggestion to rotate it was a good one, it does look better that way.
Cheers,
David
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 9, 2005, at 5:23 PM, David Nelson wrote:
I'm curious to k
In the recent windy period in Sydney, one of my Rosella plants was blown
over. I have since righted it and its peculiar response can be seen in
the following photo which I took a moment ago.
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/rosella.jpg
*ist D, FA50 macro @ f/2.8, ISO 400.
As usual, I'd apprecia
Thanks for the news, can we have a link to the booklet please?
Cheers,
David
Peter Fairweather wrote:
To all fellow LBA sufferers
On the USA Pentax site there is downloadable booklet on DA lenses
which has some details on the new fisheye
Here is a comparison with the old one
Fisheye Lens
Yea yea yea yea yea!
Cheers,
David
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
All comments solicited
Yeah, nay, and/or otherwise
What would you do differently?
Thanks in advance
Kenneth Waller
Crikey Thrainn, that's a great collection of shots! Amazing skies in the
landscape shots, very stirring images. The birds are great, more than
just 'nice' bird photos; they are all quite special.
Very jealous,
David
Thrainn Vigfusson wrote:
I finally got around to subscribing to photo.net and
(resend)
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=3878957258&ssPageName=STRK:MEWN:IT
Luckily for me, not enough people did spot it (-:
Pretty good considering the last two A 28mm f/2s on the bay went for a
tad over $330 and $400...
If anyone in the US is interested in the body and
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=3878957258&ssPageName=STRK:MEWN:IT
Luckily for me, not enough people did spot it (-:
Pretty good considering the last two A 28mm f/2s on the bay went for a
tad over $330 and $400...
If anyone in the US is interested in the body and/or fla
In the mood of adapting musician jokes to photography, here's one that
doesn't entirely work:
Why are Pentax cameras so much smaller than Canons?
They aren't. Canon photographers just have tiny brains so their cameras
look bigger.
(As a viola player I get my fair share of viola jokes but the or
Rob Studdert opined:
I think the "B" camera is short for Butt-ugly
q-: I actually like it. I think they all look awesome, but do lean
towards B. I wonder though whether deciding which exterior is to be
produced should really be based on a poll of under-glass models.
Anything like handling, funct
Good work for doing the test - I love seeing this sort of thing... one
thing I'll point out though is that it appears that focus wasn't equal
in the two tests. Take a look at the balcony rails second from the back
and you'll see the tak is sharper. The left-foreground bare plane tree
branches a
Rob Studdert wrote:
nice fast compact DA26/2 LTD would be just about perfect
as a normal.
Don't forget to add a few more specifications - as well as fast and
compact, let's ask for CHEAP, light, well built, sharp, contrasty and no
bokehmonsters... q-:
Unfortunately I can just see a very nice len
Blimey! Awesome shot! Looks like it's out of a CGI movie.
Cheers,
David
Francis wrote:
Good evening every one!
I developed my first batch of slides yesterday! (a hundred and fifty
dollars! @#^&% )
Here is one of the best ones (in my opinion).
http://www.photosynth.ca/photo/f/boat&sea-gulls.html
Ta
Great Pic. I hate you.
q-:
David
Francis wrote:
Another boat pic
I was trying halfheartedly to frame the sunset when this friend of ours
sailed onto the scene.
From that point on I was franticly running up and down the beach
snapping away. :)
http://www.photosynth.ca/photo/f/water-on-fire.html
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
